Difference between revisions of "Milestone 15 Boomerang mental model for requester and worker"

From crowdresearch
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=150828_wording_responses
 
http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=150828_wording_responses
  
'''Then comment on version 2 of mental model below:'''
+
'''Then comment on version 2 for the wording below:'''
  
 
For requesters:  
 
For requesters:  
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
Then please take a look at @neilthemathguy's screenshots of requester and worker interface:
+
Then please take a look at requester and worker interface screenshots from @neilthemathguy et al which are pinned the the #reputation-system channel
  
 
'''(insert screenshot work requester interface here)'''
 
'''(insert screenshot work requester interface here)'''

Revision as of 15:45, 30 August 2015

Please read the comments from requesters collected by @spamgirl and @arichmondfuller (at the bottom) on version 1 of boomerang mental model for requesters: http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=150828_wording_responses

Then comment on version 2 for the wording below:

For requesters: When you rate a worker, the workers whom you rank highly (✓+) will get early (privileged) access to your future work, whilst those whom you rank low (✓-) will not receive access to your future work at all. Those whom you rank as simply acceptable (✓)will receive standard access to your future work. By providing this feedback, you will also help to improve the overall quality of results delivered by Daemo.

For workers: If you rate a requester ✓+, then their tasks will appear at the top of your task feed and if you rate them ✓-, then their tasks will be buried at the bottom of your feed. Ratings of ✓ will not change their location in your feed.


Then please take a look at requester and worker interface screenshots from @neilthemathguy et al which are pinned the the #reputation-system channel

(insert screenshot work requester interface here)

(insert screenshot of worker interface here)

Comments by @asmitagupta Shouldn't we have the list of workers who accepted to take the particular task for that requester on requester's page ? so that their will be an idea of how many workers are planning to do that task