Difference between revisions of "Milestone 15 Boomerang mental model for requester and worker"

From crowdresearch
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
@channel Shall we go ahead with:
 
@channel Shall we go ahead with:
  
*What the requester sees*
+
'''What the requester sees'''
 
This worker gets...
 
This worker gets...
 +
 
√+: *early* access to your tasks
 
√+: *early* access to your tasks
 +
 
√: *normal* access to your tasks
 
√: *normal* access to your tasks
 +
 
√-: *last* access to your tasks
 
√-: *last* access to your tasks
  
*What the worker sees*
+
 
 +
 
 +
'''What the worker sees'''
 +
 
 
This requester will be at the...
 
This requester will be at the...
 +
 
√+: *top* of your task feed
 
√+: *top* of your task feed
 +
 
√: *middle* of your task feed
 
√: *middle* of your task feed
 +
 
√-: *bottom* of your task feed
 
√-: *bottom* of your task feed
  

Revision as of 20:01, 30 August 2015

Please read the comments from requesters collected by @spamgirl and @arichmondfuller on version 1 of boomerang mental model for requesters: http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=150828_wording_responses


Version 3' for comment:

@channel Shall we go ahead with:

What the requester sees This worker gets...

√+: *early* access to your tasks

√: *normal* access to your tasks

√-: *last* access to your tasks


What the worker sees

This requester will be at the...

√+: *top* of your task feed

√: *middle* of your task feed

√-: *bottom* of your task feed


Version 2 archived at the end of this document


Then please take a look at requester and worker interface screenshots from @neilthemathguy et al which are pinned the the #reputation-system channel

Requester_to_Worker.png
Worker-Requester.png ‎

Comments by @asmitagupta Shouldn't we have the list of workers who accepted to take the particular task for that requester on requester's page ? so that their will be an idea of how many workers are planning to do that task


Archived versions:

For requesters: When you rate a worker, the workers whom you rank highly (✓+) will get early (privileged) access to your future work, whilst those whom you rank low (✓-) will not receive access to your future work at all. Those whom you rank as simply acceptable (✓)will receive standard access to your future work. By providing this feedback, you will also help to improve the overall quality of results delivered by Daemo.

For workers: If you rate a requester ✓+, then their tasks will appear at the top of your task feed and if you rate them ✓-, then their tasks will be buried at the bottom of your feed. Ratings of ✓ will not change their location in your feed.