Difference between revisions of "Milestone 15 Boomerang mental model for requester and worker"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | <nowiki>***We should think about whether we need to tweak the mental model for our experiments. In the worker study for example, the task feed will be nearly functioning as a dashboard because that is where they will be rating and seeing payment and we need to be sure to drill the point home for the boomerang workers.***</nowiki> | + | Comment from @aginzberg <nowiki>***We should think about whether we need to tweak the mental model for our experiments. In the worker study for example, the task feed will be nearly functioning as a dashboard because that is where they will be rating and seeing payment and we need to be sure to drill the point home for the boomerang workers.***</nowiki> |
Revision as of 22:04, 3 September 2015
Please read the comments from requesters collected by @spamgirl and @arichmondfuller on version 1 of boomerang mental model for requesters: http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=150828_wording_responses
Comment from @aginzberg ***We should think about whether we need to tweak the mental model for our experiments. In the worker study for example, the task feed will be nearly functioning as a dashboard because that is where they will be rating and seeing payment and we need to be sure to drill the point home for the boomerang workers.***
Version 3 for comment:
What the requester sees
This worker gets...
√+: early access to your tasks
√: normal access to your tasks
√-: last access to your tasks
What the worker sees
This requester will be at the...
√+: top of your task feed
√: middle of your task feed
√-: bottom of your task feed
Version 2 archived at the end of this document
Then please take a look at requester and worker interface screenshots from @neilthemathguy et al which are pinned the the #reputation-system channel
Amendment request: On the requester page include the list of workers who have been selected to do a particular task.
Comments by @asmitagupta Shouldn't we have the list of workers who accepted to take the particular task for that requester on requester's page ? so that their will be an idea of how many workers are planning to do that task
Archived versions:
For requesters: When you rate a worker, the workers whom you rank highly (✓+) will get early (privileged) access to your future work, whilst those whom you rank low (✓-) will not receive access to your future work at all. Those whom you rank as simply acceptable (✓)will receive standard access to your future work. By providing this feedback, you will also help to improve the overall quality of results delivered by Daemo.
For workers: If you rate a requester ✓+, then their tasks will appear at the top of your task feed and if you rate them ✓-, then their tasks will be buried at the bottom of your feed. Ratings of ✓ will not change their location in your feed.
