Difference between revisions of "Milestone 5 Improving Task Authoring with a Project Manager by Team1"
From crowdresearch
m (Ahmednasserhussien moved page Milestone 4 Improving Task Authoring with a Project Manager by Team1 to Milestone 5 Improving Task Authoring with a Project Manager by Team1) |
(→Task Authorship) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Study introduction === | === Study introduction === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Requesters have an influence on the outcomes of workers, so our hypothesis is that bad authorship leads to a lower outcome quality, because of the ambiguity of tasks and its following misunderstanding. In STUDY 1 we propose a one-part experiment, using a crowdsourcing platform for the experimental environment, where we will test Project Manager (PM) and compare the results in the form of Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results before and after. | ||
=== Study method === | === Study method === | ||
Revision as of 22:54, 14 February 2016
Contents
Task Authorship
Study introduction
Requesters have an influence on the outcomes of workers, so our hypothesis is that bad authorship leads to a lower outcome quality, because of the ambiguity of tasks and its following misunderstanding. In STUDY 1 we propose a one-part experiment, using a crowdsourcing platform for the experimental environment, where we will test Project Manager (PM) and compare the results in the form of Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results before and after.
