Difference between revisions of "OpenGov 11-8-15-MeetingSummary"
(Created page with "We need Real workers and real requesters How are people given a voice? -regardless of the system --How to move forward with this? What tools are good for giving voice?...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | We need Real workers and real requesters | + | =Questions and Discussion= |
− | How are people given a voice? | + | *We need Real workers and real requesters |
− | + | *How are people given a voice? | |
− | What is the scope of the leadership board, in terms of influence? | + | **regardless of the system |
− | Bring out the data of the leadership board survey | + | **How to move forward with this? What tools are good for giving voice? |
− | next step should be to look at how our leadership board has worked | + | *What is the scope of the leadership board, in terms of influence? |
− | + | *Bring out the data of the leadership board survey | |
− | satisfaction survey | + | **next step should be to look at how our leadership board has worked |
− | need to create a baseline survey!! | + | ==Meta issues== |
− | Test our ability to question the workers and requesters within Daemo | + | *satisfaction survey |
− | Is our system better than what they used to have? | + | *need to create a baseline survey!! |
− | How to measure people's interaction, especially how to measure good relationships | + | *Test our ability to question the workers and requesters within Daemo |
− | exit interviews for if workers or requesters leave Daemo? | + | *Is our system better than what they used to have? |
− | Operationalize some of their comments to quantifiable measures | + | *How to measure people's interaction, especially how to measure good relationships |
− | How to Quantify member satisfaction | + | *exit interviews for if workers or requesters leave Daemo? |
− | way to verify this with the survey? | + | *Operationalize some of their comments to quantifiable measures |
− | Can we develop a satisfaction quotient or trust factor through modeling? | + | *How to Quantify member satisfaction |
− | Custodial model - Organization researcher at MIT | + | **way to verify this with the survey? |
− | How do you start cold start? | + | *Can we develop a satisfaction quotient or trust factor through modeling? |
− | What issues of onboarding and creating operational world at the same time are there? | + | *Custodial model - Organization researcher at MIT |
− | We need to allow for evolution and maturity, but how do they change over time? | + | ==How do you start cold start?== |
− | Collaborative networks | + | *What issues of onboarding and creating operational world at the same time are there? |
− | Measure could be within rewards like our badge network | + | *We need to allow for evolution and maturity, but how do they change over time? |
− | Leadership networks, are they identifiable? | + | ==Collaborative networks== |
− | Measuring interactivity | + | *Measure could be within rewards like our badge network |
− | Define or Conceptualize dimensions that could affect interactivity | + | *Leadership networks, are they identifiable? |
− | Readings from dilrukshi can shed light on this | + | *Measuring interactivity |
− | Workers didn’t have a voice that was heard, tools to increase awareness of a workers commet | + | **Define or Conceptualize dimensions that could affect interactivity |
− | Want to give them a formal channel of communication? In terms of forums or chats as typical tools are | + | **Readings from dilrukshi can shed light on this |
− | Get in touch with Mohammad in where he is at for the tools of worker communication | + | *Workers didn’t have a voice that was heard, tools to increase awareness of a workers commet |
− | Where does our idea of cooperation in building Daemo reflect within our marketplace? | + | *Want to give them a formal channel of communication? In terms of forums or chats as typical tools are |
− | More active communication than forum | + | *Get in touch with Mohammad in where he is at for the tools of worker communication |
− | + | *Where does our idea of cooperation in building Daemo reflect within our marketplace? | |
− | + | **More active communication than forum | |
− | Rajan’s work on crowd cafes? | + | ***Possible active chat |
− | Consumer satisfaction surveys? | + | ***Spam girl’s work with physical space and organization |
− | What was their measurement style? | + | **Rajan’s work on crowd cafes? |
− | Current questions already exist, how to use these questions to build a model of satisfaction? | + | *Consumer satisfaction surveys? |
− | Trygve's goals for Wednesday: satisfaction surveys and our own questions | + | **What was their measurement style? |
− | Dilrukshi's goals for Wednesday: active communication, research ideas and implementation in Daemo | + | **Current questions already exist, how to use these questions to build a model of satisfaction? |
− | Curious to see how much interface there is between worker to worker | + | =Goals= |
− | Is more interaction better for workers? | + | *Trygve's goals for Wednesday: satisfaction surveys and our own questions |
− | In terms of Satisfaction or work? | + | *Dilrukshi's goals for Wednesday: active communication, research ideas and implementation in Daemo |
− | Angela interested in learning groups? | + | *Curious to see how much interface there is between worker to worker |
− | Application Towards Daemo | + | **Is more interaction better for workers? |
− | Ryan's Goals: Talk with Mohammad on current tools for communication within Daemo, research measuring collaboration and what already exists out there now, and how to apply this within Daemo | + | **In terms of Satisfaction or work? |
+ | *Angela interested in learning groups? | ||
+ | **Application Towards Daemo | ||
+ | *Ryan's Goals: Talk with Mohammad on current tools for communication within Daemo, research measuring collaboration and what already exists out there now, and how to apply this within Daemo | ||
− | Milestone this week | + | =Milestone this week= |
− | Create feasible research and tool agenda | + | *Create feasible research and tool agenda |
− | what tools do we want to implement for better communication and collaboration for workers and requesters in Daemo | + | **what tools do we want to implement for better communication and collaboration for workers and requesters in Daemo |
− | What will make Daemo stand out as a significant tool for crowdworker collaboration? | + | ***What will make Daemo stand out as a significant tool for crowdworker collaboration? |
− | Look at current communication structure for crowdmarket places | + | ***Look at current communication structure for crowdmarket places |
− | Examine meetings with Spam girl | + | ***Examine meetings with Spam girl |
− | should we have another one? | + | ****should we have another one? |
Revision as of 20:20, 8 November 2015
Contents
Questions and Discussion
- We need Real workers and real requesters
- How are people given a voice?
**regardless of the system **How to move forward with this? What tools are good for giving voice?
- What is the scope of the leadership board, in terms of influence?
- Bring out the data of the leadership board survey
**next step should be to look at how our leadership board has worked
Meta issues
*satisfaction survey *need to create a baseline survey!! *Test our ability to question the workers and requesters within Daemo *Is our system better than what they used to have? *How to measure people's interaction, especially how to measure good relationships *exit interviews for if workers or requesters leave Daemo? *Operationalize some of their comments to quantifiable measures *How to Quantify member satisfaction **way to verify this with the survey? *Can we develop a satisfaction quotient or trust factor through modeling?
- Custodial model - Organization researcher at MIT
How do you start cold start?
*What issues of onboarding and creating operational world at the same time are there? *We need to allow for evolution and maturity, but how do they change over time?
Collaborative networks
*Measure could be within rewards like our badge network *Leadership networks, are they identifiable? *Measuring interactivity **Define or Conceptualize dimensions that could affect interactivity **Readings from dilrukshi can shed light on this *Workers didn’t have a voice that was heard, tools to increase awareness of a workers commet *Want to give them a formal channel of communication? In terms of forums or chats as typical tools are *Get in touch with Mohammad in where he is at for the tools of worker communication
- Where does our idea of cooperation in building Daemo reflect within our marketplace?
**More active communication than forum ***Possible active chat ***Spam girl’s work with physical space and organization **Rajan’s work on crowd cafes?
- Consumer satisfaction surveys?
**What was their measurement style? **Current questions already exist, how to use these questions to build a model of satisfaction?
Goals
- Trygve's goals for Wednesday: satisfaction surveys and our own questions
- Dilrukshi's goals for Wednesday: active communication, research ideas and implementation in Daemo
- Curious to see how much interface there is between worker to worker
**Is more interaction better for workers? **In terms of Satisfaction or work?
- Angela interested in learning groups?
**Application Towards Daemo
- Ryan's Goals: Talk with Mohammad on current tools for communication within Daemo, research measuring collaboration and what already exists out there now, and how to apply this within Daemo
Milestone this week
*Create feasible research and tool agenda **what tools do we want to implement for better communication and collaboration for workers and requesters in Daemo ***What will make Daemo stand out as a significant tool for crowdworker collaboration? ***Look at current communication structure for crowdmarket places ***Examine meetings with Spam girl ****should we have another one?