Difference between revisions of "OpenGov 11-8-15-MeetingSummary"
From crowdresearch
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*We need Real workers and real requesters | *We need Real workers and real requesters | ||
*How are people given a voice? | *How are people given a voice? | ||
| − | + | **regardless of the system | |
| − | + | **How to move forward with this? What tools are good for giving voice? | |
*What is the scope of the leadership board, in terms of influence? | *What is the scope of the leadership board, in terms of influence? | ||
*Bring out the data of the leadership board survey | *Bring out the data of the leadership board survey | ||
| − | + | **next step should be to look at how our leadership board has worked | |
==Meta issues== | ==Meta issues== | ||
| − | + | *satisfaction survey | |
| − | + | *need to create a baseline survey!! | |
| − | + | *Test our ability to question the workers and requesters within Daemo | |
| − | + | *Is our system better than what they used to have? | |
| − | + | *How to measure people's interaction, especially how to measure good relationships | |
| − | + | *exit interviews for if workers or requesters leave Daemo? | |
| − | + | *Operationalize some of their comments to quantifiable measures | |
| − | + | *How to Quantify member satisfaction | |
| − | + | **way to verify this with the survey? | |
| − | + | *Can we develop a satisfaction quotient or trust factor through modeling? | |
*Custodial model - Organization researcher at MIT | *Custodial model - Organization researcher at MIT | ||
==How do you start cold start?== | ==How do you start cold start?== | ||
| − | + | *What issues of onboarding and creating operational world at the same time are there? | |
| − | + | *We need to allow for evolution and maturity, but how do they change over time? | |
==Collaborative networks== | ==Collaborative networks== | ||
| − | + | *Measure could be within rewards like our badge network | |
| − | + | *Leadership networks, are they identifiable? | |
| − | + | *Measuring interactivity | |
| − | + | **Define or Conceptualize dimensions that could affect interactivity | |
| − | + | **Readings from dilrukshi can shed light on this | |
| − | + | *Workers didn’t have a voice that was heard, tools to increase awareness of a workers commet | |
| − | + | *Want to give them a formal channel of communication? In terms of forums or chats as typical tools are | |
| − | + | *Get in touch with Mohammad in where he is at for the tools of worker communication | |
*Where does our idea of cooperation in building Daemo reflect within our marketplace? | *Where does our idea of cooperation in building Daemo reflect within our marketplace? | ||
| − | + | **More active communication than forum | |
| − | + | ***Possible active chat | |
| − | + | ***Spam girl’s work with physical space and organization | |
| − | + | **Rajan’s work on crowd cafes? | |
*Consumer satisfaction surveys? | *Consumer satisfaction surveys? | ||
| − | + | **What was their measurement style? | |
| − | + | **Current questions already exist, how to use these questions to build a model of satisfaction? | |
=Goals= | =Goals= | ||
*Trygve's goals for Wednesday: satisfaction surveys and our own questions | *Trygve's goals for Wednesday: satisfaction surveys and our own questions | ||
*Dilrukshi's goals for Wednesday: active communication, research ideas and implementation in Daemo | *Dilrukshi's goals for Wednesday: active communication, research ideas and implementation in Daemo | ||
*Curious to see how much interface there is between worker to worker | *Curious to see how much interface there is between worker to worker | ||
| − | + | **Is more interaction better for workers? | |
| − | + | **In terms of Satisfaction or work? | |
*Angela interested in learning groups? | *Angela interested in learning groups? | ||
| − | + | **Application Towards Daemo | |
*Ryan's Goals: Talk with Mohammad on current tools for communication within Daemo, research measuring collaboration and what already exists out there now, and how to apply this within Daemo | *Ryan's Goals: Talk with Mohammad on current tools for communication within Daemo, research measuring collaboration and what already exists out there now, and how to apply this within Daemo | ||
=Milestone this week= | =Milestone this week= | ||
| − | + | *Create feasible research and tool agenda | |
| − | + | **what tools do we want to implement for better communication and collaboration for workers and requesters in Daemo | |
| − | + | ***What will make Daemo stand out as a significant tool for crowdworker collaboration? | |
| − | + | ***Look at current communication structure for crowdmarket places | |
| − | + | ***Examine meetings with Spam girl | |
| − | + | ****should we have another one? | |
Revision as of 20:22, 8 November 2015
Contents
Questions and Discussion
- We need Real workers and real requesters
- How are people given a voice?
- regardless of the system
- How to move forward with this? What tools are good for giving voice?
- What is the scope of the leadership board, in terms of influence?
- Bring out the data of the leadership board survey
- next step should be to look at how our leadership board has worked
Meta issues
- satisfaction survey
- need to create a baseline survey!!
- Test our ability to question the workers and requesters within Daemo
- Is our system better than what they used to have?
- How to measure people's interaction, especially how to measure good relationships
- exit interviews for if workers or requesters leave Daemo?
- Operationalize some of their comments to quantifiable measures
- How to Quantify member satisfaction
- way to verify this with the survey?
- Can we develop a satisfaction quotient or trust factor through modeling?
- Custodial model - Organization researcher at MIT
How do you start cold start?
- What issues of onboarding and creating operational world at the same time are there?
- We need to allow for evolution and maturity, but how do they change over time?
Collaborative networks
- Measure could be within rewards like our badge network
- Leadership networks, are they identifiable?
- Measuring interactivity
- Define or Conceptualize dimensions that could affect interactivity
- Readings from dilrukshi can shed light on this
- Workers didn’t have a voice that was heard, tools to increase awareness of a workers commet
- Want to give them a formal channel of communication? In terms of forums or chats as typical tools are
- Get in touch with Mohammad in where he is at for the tools of worker communication
- Where does our idea of cooperation in building Daemo reflect within our marketplace?
- More active communication than forum
- Possible active chat
- Spam girl’s work with physical space and organization
- Rajan’s work on crowd cafes?
- More active communication than forum
- Consumer satisfaction surveys?
- What was their measurement style?
- Current questions already exist, how to use these questions to build a model of satisfaction?
Goals
- Trygve's goals for Wednesday: satisfaction surveys and our own questions
- Dilrukshi's goals for Wednesday: active communication, research ideas and implementation in Daemo
- Curious to see how much interface there is between worker to worker
- Is more interaction better for workers?
- In terms of Satisfaction or work?
- Angela interested in learning groups?
- Application Towards Daemo
- Ryan's Goals: Talk with Mohammad on current tools for communication within Daemo, research measuring collaboration and what already exists out there now, and how to apply this within Daemo
Milestone this week
- Create feasible research and tool agenda
- what tools do we want to implement for better communication and collaboration for workers and requesters in Daemo
- What will make Daemo stand out as a significant tool for crowdworker collaboration?
- Look at current communication structure for crowdmarket places
- Examine meetings with Spam girl
- should we have another one?
- what tools do we want to implement for better communication and collaboration for workers and requesters in Daemo
