Difference between revisions of "Pumas futurePlatform"

From crowdresearch
Jump to: navigation, search
(Crowd Research)
(Crowd Research)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
'''Fast Execution of Quality Research'''<br>
 
'''Fast Execution of Quality Research'''<br>
 
Here we need to tackle: how do we make rapid decisions and progress while still engaging with new and exciting ideas and letting new people contribute?<br>
 
Here we need to tackle: how do we make rapid decisions and progress while still engaging with new and exciting ideas and letting new people contribute?<br>
We have thought that having a leadership board could help to execute quality research more rapidly. However, here we believe  it is important to make transparent  the process of joining the leadership board (i.e., how do you get selected to join the board), as well as the actions of the board. This would remove shady smokey room effects, We believe that the leadership board should not have a  limit on the number of people who can join. This could help limit competition. We also have to make it affordable for a person to be part of the board. Senior researchers might consider doing contributions elsewhere where they can do less for more recognition and wuality research.
+
We have thought that having a leadership board could help to execute quality research more rapidly. However, here we believe  it is important to make transparent  the process of joining the leadership board (i.e., how do you get selected to join the board), as well as the actions of the board. This would remove shady smokey room effects, We believe that the leadership board should not have a  limit on the number of people who can join. This could help limit competition. We also have to make it affordable for a person to be part of the board. Senior researchers might consider doing contributions elsewhere where they can do less for more recognition and more impactful research.
  
 
Contributors:
 
Contributors:
 
*Saiph  
 
*Saiph  
 
*Add name here
 
*Add name here

Revision as of 20:45, 20 July 2015

CrowdResearch is currently tackling two different problems that will change the world:

  • Create new crowd market place
  • Conduct research with the crowd.

We believe that to succeed it might be easier to tackle each problem separately. The crowd market place should be a startup that is created following traditional forms of production (i.e., with paid staff). Crowd Research can be the "labs" aspect of the startup that focuses on conducting research. Some of the research will feed into the startup. Having a more traditional form of production for the crowd market place will facilitate developing a comercial platform.

Crowd Market Place

The crowd market place has the potential of changing people's lives throughout the world. We believe that to finish building the platform and be used across the globe it might be more efficient to adopt a more traditional production model (rather than developing the platform with the crowd):

The crowd Market Place should be a social business. The platform needs paid staff that will have the platform ready for commercial use. We could continue with our system of volunteers while we gather profit to have hired staff. But after the platform starts to have earnings we use that to pay a staff. We could think that the staff of the platform could involve Software Engineers, User Experience Engineers, Product Manager, Senior UX Designer, Community Engagement, Public Policy Manager, Recruiters etc.

Following a more traditional mode of production could facilitate having the platform ready for worldwide use. We could think of using crowd funding approaches, apply for grants, etc to further fund the platform.

Crowd Research

Crowd research has the potential of also changing people's lives, really brining change into the world by transforming who gets to be a creator. That is amazing! We believe crowd research should continue to work on designing the crowd market place of tomorrow. Exploring different aspects of it. Crowd research could be the "labs" section of our crowd market place. Note However crowd research should focus on producing research not on creating a business.

Crowd research has its own challenges which merit exploring different workflows styles. Some of the challenges we see are:

Fostering Collaborative Environment instead of Competitive Environment
The environment in Crowd Research has become more competitive. We believe it is important to harvest environment of collaboration instead of competition. For this purpose we propose that a research culture should be streamlined across the project. The culture could limit behavior that affects collaboration. The culture could also encourage people to be transparent. Transparency could remove smokey room effect and uncooperative behaviors. The research culture could also favor collaborations and look down on competing against peers.


Fast Execution of Quality Research
Here we need to tackle: how do we make rapid decisions and progress while still engaging with new and exciting ideas and letting new people contribute?
We have thought that having a leadership board could help to execute quality research more rapidly. However, here we believe it is important to make transparent the process of joining the leadership board (i.e., how do you get selected to join the board), as well as the actions of the board. This would remove shady smokey room effects, We believe that the leadership board should not have a limit on the number of people who can join. This could help limit competition. We also have to make it affordable for a person to be part of the board. Senior researchers might consider doing contributions elsewhere where they can do less for more recognition and more impactful research.

Contributors:

  • Saiph
  • Add name here