Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...for a new crowdsourcing platform called Daemo. I'm helping to work on the reputation system there, and we're trying to make the wording very clear for it. What
    9 KB (1,683 words) - 11:53, 31 August 2015
  • Instead of a reputation system, the Agency model repositions power to a third party that holds the ...y to Cold War MAD philosophy is germaine; the threat to destroy the others reputation, while distasteful is an effective way to minimize ethical/moral transgress
    4 KB (650 words) - 18:52, 31 January 2016
  • * Reputation System 1 [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvSmgjkEi5k watch] * Reputation System 2 [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8q5n2kmWRE watch]
    33 KB (4,552 words) - 20:11, 3 April 2017
  • '''Boomerang Reputation System'''
    3 KB (534 words) - 12:14, 17 September 2016
  • == Boomerang Reputation Experiment == Boomerang is a reputation system designed to incentivize workers and requesters to rate each other ho
    2 KB (218 words) - 07:09, 14 September 2015
  • ...ntuitive indicator than plain text. Specific colors can be used to reflect reputation scores of workers/requesters by replacing the words "check+", "check" and "
    592 B (86 words) - 00:35, 28 August 2015
  • ...is assigned points based on his reputation. The higher his experience and reputation the more points he gets, which he can use to message requesters for clarifi
    4 KB (646 words) - 19:25, 8 February 2016
  • -Qualifications & Reputation: Is some form of reputation
    7 KB (880 words) - 00:41, 10 February 2016
  • --Act in ways that protect my reputation
    2 KB (300 words) - 14:15, 20 June 2016
  • Customized Boomerang is a reputation system that extends original Boomerang to a broader version. ...questers and workers can provide more genuine reviews and thus help reduce reputation inflation at online crowdsourcing platforms. However, the task feed in Daem
    22 KB (3,631 words) - 06:57, 17 February 2016
  • 5 elected directly from the community, proven history in Daemo, good reputation, and contribution to the forum .
    2 KB (242 words) - 15:40, 28 April 2016
  • 5 elected directly from the community, proven history in Daemo, good reputation, and contribution to the forum .
    1 KB (194 words) - 15:03, 28 April 2016
  • 5 elected directly from the community, proven history in Daemo, good reputation, and contribution to the forum .
    2 KB (248 words) - 20:05, 23 May 2016
  • ...platform based on their performance on tasks and their skills. Also, their reputation would have to be monitored/analyzed by some reputable people, at the very b Again, here I am as a worker, now with a good reputation and membership in a guild. I’ve realized there is some sort with the poll
    7 KB (1,170 words) - 21:08, 21 February 2016
  • ...out to other areas of work without barriers or fear of it affecting their reputation rating in the crowdsourcing marketplace. Workers want timely, relevant oppo
    4 KB (645 words) - 15:47, 7 February 2016
  • 3) Issue of reputation system, pressurizing crowdworker (rating, etc.) as explained in [http://cro
    8 KB (1,357 words) - 08:47, 14 February 2016
  • '''Information between workers and Requesters''' : Reputation of workers, quality of tasks description, priority of taskfeed. and estimat
    2 KB (221 words) - 19:06, 5 November 2016
  • ...ers require a "work profile", which will keep track of their skills, their reputation or rating and other specification necessary for them to depict when they ar
    7 KB (1,032 words) - 14:18, 10 May 2015
  • I have made 15 slides describing how we can model a reputation system framing
    247 B (37 words) - 05:27, 5 August 2015
  • Why not using guilds to address the reputation issue in crowdsourcing:
    932 B (148 words) - 11:30, 11 February 2016
  • Bringing a bit of game design you could design a reputation system where you have both levels and perhaps classes. In terms of levellin Workers' and requesters' reputation linked directly to each class or area rather than an aggregate for all the
    2 KB (307 words) - 16:28, 31 January 2016
  • The Reputation System is integral to supporting trust in and of Daemo by allowing workers To date, most reputation systems distill to a single flat metric, 4 out of 5 stars, a rating of A,B,
    3 KB (447 words) - 16:51, 3 August 2015
  • Boomerang - Daemo's reputation system Reputation System - the system whereby individuals are given ratings
    5 KB (758 words) - 04:29, 4 November 2016
  • ...as possible OR modest amount to either reinvest for platform development, reputation review payments etc.)
    7 KB (1,053 words) - 08:17, 6 June 2015
  • *2. Expertise and Competency expectation/standardization (Reputation/Trust). Can guilds solve the ironic relationship between pricing and skill ...(Not the facebook kind J) to establish the definition of expertise, beyond reputation and perception. Once expertise/competency has been defined (as a quality qu
    21 KB (3,212 words) - 13:42, 16 February 2016
  • * Issue of reputation system, pressurizing crowdworker (rating, etc.) as explained in [http://cro
    10 KB (1,605 words) - 10:19, 28 February 2016
  • ...a key process within Guilds on Daemo. Leveling directly impacts pricing, reputation, and although we are not yet addressing training and learning, there are al
    4 KB (610 words) - 09:13, 19 April 2016
  • *2. Expertise and Competency expectation/standardization (Reputation/Trust) ...(Not the facebook kind J) to establish the definition of expertise, beyond reputation and perception. Once expertise/competency has been devined (as a quality qu
    5 KB (811 words) - 10:36, 2 February 2016
  • ...r workers in the guildcondition will be determined by their guild ranking; reputation for workers in the control condition will be determined by their work accep
    6 KB (884 words) - 05:32, 5 April 2016
  • ...By using this method, we're able to ensure that we're addressing both the reputation and quality issues without creating friction within the community. ...l is influenced by the asymmetry in power, information access, pricing and reputation of Mturk. It is pervasive and the impulse is to correct the injustice; for
    20 KB (3,320 words) - 16:26, 21 February 2016
  • In discussion we decided that a forum with some kind of reputation features would be a good level to start with. [http://daemo-forum.herokuapp
    10 KB (1,711 words) - 19:13, 27 March 2016
  • ...if the requester doesn’t like what I do? And how does all this solve the reputation problem?(MB Question) ...ools to return balance to the reputation challenge? Short of removing the reputation inflation problem entirely by hand picking each and every worker and buildi
    17 KB (2,660 words) - 20:25, 16 February 2016
  • Reputation systems can be gamed, to the point they are rendered irrelevant while testi ...across the platform is the best way to ensure that our approach solves the reputation problem faced by crowdsourcing services nowadays because it allows the plat
    24 KB (4,107 words) - 06:15, 15 February 2016
  • *6. Eleni Koutrouli and Aphrodite Tsalgatidou. Reputation Systems Evaluation Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 48, 3, Article 35, December 20 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2835373 - File:Reputation evaluation survey A35-koutrouli.pdf
    4 KB (478 words) - 12:02, 20 February 2016
  • Last night, @neilthemathguy, @dilrukshi, and I had a hangout discussing the Reputation System UI and how to expand on it. Here is what we discussed and here is my
    2 KB (414 words) - 12:11, 29 August 2015
  • '''Horton Reputation Paper Analysis - Team Pumas''' The definition of “reputation” evolved from “private beliefs market participants had about each other
    10 KB (1,568 words) - 23:20, 28 July 2015
  • * Workers want to learn more about their requesters reputation about the requests they have posted and how they have responded to their pr * Requesters would like to have access to the worker reputation and history and have a better understanding of their demographics.
    6 KB (917 words) - 19:57, 24 January 2016
  • ** Reputation
    9 KB (1,458 words) - 14:09, 27 May 2015
  • * '''Reputation''': How might we make payment clear and transparent? * [Active] '''Import finance concepts/External quality ratings''': Reputation, like credit score: worker ratings of requesters place them into A, B (good
    14 KB (2,161 words) - 09:08, 23 May 2015
  • * '''Reputation''': How might we make payment clear and transparent? * '''Import finance concepts/External quality ratings''': Reputation, like credit score: worker ratings of requesters place them into A, B (good
    18 KB (2,841 words) - 23:19, 2 January 2016
  • '''#reputation-sys''' -
    4 KB (602 words) - 22:39, 10 October 2015
  • ...ote that matches his/her actual opinion, the platform would confer a badge/reputation points, as well as, among other things, allow the platform to recommend any ...e all forum actions (posts, votes, etc.) with a person's Daemo profile and reputation. Each person can only create one forum account.
    6 KB (1,018 words) - 02:02, 16 November 2015
  • = '''Reputation and Other Ideas by Jsilver''' = I will post a collection of my "wish-list" reputation ideas (among other ideas), some of which have been scattered in my mind and
    10 KB (1,507 words) - 23:09, 15 November 2015
  • ...ek 10 milestone]]. The next step would be to identify common themes like [[reputation inflation]] and split them off into their own articles with support from th Finally, project subgroups (open-governance, reputation-systems, leadership-board) should have their own pages with descriptions an
    3 KB (570 words) - 18:57, 6 August 2015
  • I am keen to further support the work in Usability, Reputation Systems, paper submissions and whatever else is needed. This research proje ...project: platform, usability, task creation, feedback, pricing mechanism, reputation, sustainability, and open governance.
    18 KB (2,978 words) - 09:08, 31 July 2015
  • ...hen you also take into account the impact those decisions have on pricing, reputation, and training/learning, the enormity can be overwhelming. Hence the need t Reputation:
    6 KB (982 words) - 06:51, 26 June 2015
  • Crowdsourcing platforms are subject to reputation inflation due to repercussions from social pressures. As a result worker-re
    4 KB (552 words) - 06:31, 5 April 2016
  • How might we allow workers to crowd-regulate reputation and expertise? .... Guilds must internally self regulate or risk losing prestigue, standing, reputation. Yet, Requestors also benefit in that instead of having to trust (and go th
    2 KB (324 words) - 22:29, 18 March 2015
  • Evaluation for Boomberang Reputation System ...ers; taking workers with poor reputation; medium reputation; and excellent reputation.
    1 KB (171 words) - 18:44, 30 August 2015
  • ...hird party the task should be taken down and it should mark the requesters reputation.
    3 KB (546 words) - 17:04, 24 March 2015
  • This week we are focusing on the three themes Empathy, Resolution and Reputation. We discussed on these themes and concluded that == Reputation ==
    3 KB (494 words) - 22:14, 25 March 2015
  • ...across the platform is the best way to ensure that our approach solves the reputation problem faced by crowdsourcing services nowadays because it allows the plat ...y is most similar to the experience required by a determined task (aka his reputation towards a specific skill set)?
    13 KB (2,145 words) - 12:28, 14 February 2016
  • ...efore we show them.We recommend 3. They select the worker level they need (reputation), which guides who is able to submit to Milestone 0. Any sufficiently qualified individual via the reputation requirements can submit Milestone 0, first come first serve, up to the maxi
    7 KB (1,188 words) - 06:20, 28 June 2015
  • ...actors to limit unrealistic expectations or unappreciated efforts (e.g. by reputation tracking, workflow accountability, audits); and collaborative efforts to gu ...missions that pass some threshold are moved forward to a second tier where reputation-having (accountable, potentially not anonymized) crowdworkers can essential
    33 KB (5,307 words) - 17:23, 8 May 2015
  • ...t belong to any Grade. After working on various tasks they eventually gain reputation and are promoted to different grades. The highest grade is Grade A. ...e gets the earlier promised pay irrespective of his grade and boost to his reputation.
    4 KB (762 words) - 08:22, 8 May 2015
  • ...is the ability to repeatedly work with the same requester. Maybe even have reputation scores on requesters ("This requester is cool to work with 5/5 would work a
    5 KB (944 words) - 21:17, 6 May 2015
  • ...ll be collectively discussing and contributing to external quality ratings/reputation systems'''. People interested in contributing to infrastructure should chec == Reputation systems ==
    4 KB (564 words) - 22:08, 10 May 2015
  • This week we'll take the brainstorming about open-gov and reputation system to next level, by getting user feedback. In order for us to have a s == Reputation systems ==
    4 KB (557 words) - 00:47, 23 May 2015
  • ...interface screenshots from @neilthemathguy et al which are pinned the the #reputation-system channel
    4 KB (639 words) - 03:32, 16 November 2015
  • I would also like to suggest again, that we look at keeping the reputation specific to the category of work rather than a holistic rating of person.
    4 KB (736 words) - 16:58, 14 October 2015
  • ...o discourage requestors from posting anything less than standards. If such reputation is integrated in a more transparent way within the system, it would be bett ...f reviews, where as a new person may not have time to work to gain similar reputation. In TaskRabbit, highest rated taskers are called TaskRabbit Elite and have
    10 KB (1,826 words) - 23:37, 4 March 2015
  • ...nal (and slower), where you're encouraged to show off your skills, build a reputation, and commit to larger projects.
    13 KB (2,184 words) - 22:37, 4 March 2015
  • * nothing is done to give Turkers a better reputation; seen as “third world”, unskilled, etc.
    16 KB (2,777 words) - 10:14, 6 March 2015
  • ...unction of historic tasks and quality can help create digital profiles and reputation of workers. This is similar to design feature used in TaskRabbit or [http:/
    25 KB (3,685 words) - 11:32, 17 January 2016
  • ...example,one of our team member was personally motivated to get a five star reputation in the Twitter category as he was very active on that social media and henc
    7 KB (1,191 words) - 23:08, 4 March 2015
  • ...example,one of our team member was personally motivated to get a five star reputation in the Twitter category as he was very active on that social media and henc
    9 KB (1,465 words) - 22:39, 4 March 2015
  • ...n their chat rooms and threads. Be thoughtful! Researchers have a bit of a reputation for just marching in and telling Turkers what they really need, which isn't
    14 KB (2,180 words) - 10:42, 11 March 2015
  • ...ments by requestors have adverse impact on turkers motivation, earning and reputation. 3. They need to have a balance between anonymity and reputation<br>
    17 KB (2,703 words) - 01:03, 12 March 2015
  • ...d workers can complete them at any time, without having to think about the reputation of the requester or to refamiliarize themselves with the task. This should 1. Most good workers leave the market because due to absence of reputation system the wages of good and bad workers is same.With so low wages, good wo
    13 KB (2,224 words) - 22:18, 11 March 2015
  • ...T, and the interface also doesn't come to any help. This can lead to a bad reputation of the Requester, as the worker said that he will stay away from the reques
    17 KB (2,765 words) - 00:01, 12 March 2015
  • - Worker reputation system is broken (as mentioned above), it is too easy to game the system an - Requesters don't have a reputation system they can manage on Amazon. Reputation is derived from forums like Turker Nation using tools like TurkOpticon.
    12 KB (2,110 words) - 21:48, 11 March 2015
  • *Requestors need to learn about their workers reputation.
    15 KB (2,426 words) - 23:24, 11 March 2015
  • * Rejection from requesters are only give negative feedbacks. It affects reputation and might cost money.
    6 KB (917 words) - 23:21, 11 March 2015
  • ...n various parameters to create a standardized way to asses a requester’s reputation, which can be helpful to other workers. *If a worker can appeal against a rejection, his quality of work and reputation should sustain longer
    11 KB (1,888 words) - 19:45, 11 March 2015
  • # Some can do task for reputation rather than money # No reputation or rating system for requester which in turn allows spammers to become top
    21 KB (3,329 words) - 13:13, 11 March 2015
  • * Lack of a fair reputation system for workers. # Lack of trust due to unreliable reputation/rating system of the workers can lead to dilution of quality because effici
    23 KB (3,585 words) - 23:16, 11 March 2015
  • ===== Workers need to Build their Reputation more efficiently ===== *Observations: In crowdsourcing environments it is difficult to build a reputation
    34 KB (5,278 words) - 23:06, 11 March 2015
  • ...e of workers in forums like reddit or other turking forums can lead to bad reputation of requesters over time, especially those who rely on crowdsourcing often. ...uesters are the best to work for directly and some requesters may have bad reputation on the forums due to previous HIT acceptance/ rejection results.
    13 KB (2,136 words) - 09:44, 13 March 2015
  • **'''Needs:''' Behind the scenes or more elegant systems for reputation, quality control, and relationship building so that workers and requesters **'''Interpretation:''' For requesters, in the absence of a reputation system, sheer volume of HITs completed and percentage accuracy is better th
    30 KB (4,967 words) - 21:56, 11 March 2015
  • **'''Needs:''' Behind the scenes or more elegant systems for reputation, quality control, and relationship building so that workers and requesters **'''Interpretation:''' For requesters, in the absence of a reputation system, sheer volume of HITs completed and percentage accuracy is better th
    30 KB (4,937 words) - 22:13, 11 March 2015
  • #Workers' reputation is always at stake. If requestors reject the tasks workers cannot appeal ag
    37 KB (5,448 words) - 16:24, 24 January 2016
  • ...ave made for spending the time and effort on task but also it spoils their reputation and a future chance of work. * Reputation without Retribution: Maintain accountability and anonymity
    33 KB (5,087 words) - 05:10, 12 March 2015
  • ...unjustly, do not only lose the opportunity to earn the money but also lose reputation.
    11 KB (1,746 words) - 00:00, 12 March 2015
  • ...s till any time they want to without having to think about the requester's reputation. The scope of Turker platforms helps in virtual migration since the crowdla ...may even refuse to pay.When a new requester comes he has to maintain some reputation and earn trust of the workers.
    14 KB (2,321 words) - 23:58, 11 March 2015
  • How can we establish a true reputation for AMT workers? This is the question of this paper. An interesting point I
    8 KB (1,266 words) - 08:37, 12 March 2015
  • O - I generally select based on past reputation O - Reputation of requestors is built in as well even if not explicit
    12 KB (2,120 words) - 18:07, 24 January 2016
  • ...ent structure. In addition, they need to manually check each requester’s reputation beforehand in order to avoid possible fraud, as well as the level of qualit ...can be rejected without justification what has bad effects on the workers reputation. However, if the platform is not user-friendly, good workers are tented to
    17 KB (2,898 words) - 15:40, 11 March 2015
  • ...the new workers, it is very difficult to grow. In order to get a decent a reputation, they first need to work with requesters who either pay very low wages or a ...' The good/high­-paying requesters would rather go with workers with good reputation in order to ensure quality of work.
    17 KB (2,926 words) - 14:08, 11 March 2015
  • ===== A better and true reputation system for workers ===== * current reputation system uses no. of HITs completed and approval rate which are easy to manip
    21 KB (3,371 words) - 13:21, 11 March 2015
  • * Rejection of worker can lead a requestet to put down his reputation in crowdsourcing market. * Number of spammers is growing with the lack of checks and a satisfactory reputation management system.
    13 KB (2,137 words) - 01:41, 12 March 2015
  • ...ould make it easier to set prices, spread best practices, build meaningful reputation systems and track quality. * A true reputation system for workers.
    15 KB (2,464 words) - 22:50, 11 March 2015
  • ...ks. Spends a lot of time in search of a suitable task, pay rate, requester reputation to make an informed decision. 3. The reputation is subject to revision by workers based on his/her responsiveness, task qua
    9 KB (1,528 words) - 20:28, 11 March 2015
  • *The workers are usually in the dark about the reputation of the requester when it comes to fair or unfair rejections. ...owser extensions and add-ons available that inform workers about requester reputation, average time required, etc.
    36 KB (5,853 words) - 01:00, 12 March 2015
  • * need a balance between anonymity and reputation. "A Worker Reputation System"
    24 KB (3,754 words) - 17:17, 11 March 2015
  • ...guarantee the trustworthiness of the requesters. Just having a subjective reputation system for requesters does not suffice.
    20 KB (3,253 words) - 20:21, 11 March 2015
  • ...without feedback, this makes it difficult for new users to establish their reputation and get jobs that will help develop their skillsets. ...become risk-averse when a task might be confusing enough to threaten their reputation or payment
    15 KB (2,493 words) - 00:44, 21 March 2015
  • ...he worker is not a spammer?:''' Background check, the worker's profile and reputation till now on MTurk. ...kers who have completed a broad range of jobs successfully and have a good reputation in their respective crowdsourcing platforms must be given power to mediate
    7 KB (1,219 words) - 22:55, 18 March 2015
  • ...kers who have completed a broad range of jobs successfully and have a good reputation in their respective crowdsourcing platforms can be given power to mediate b
    448 B (69 words) - 22:39, 18 March 2015
  • ...invalid rejections, moderators can be informed and this should effect the reputation of Requesters.
    3 KB (513 words) - 00:06, 19 March 2015
  • ...o their auto reputation, requesters would have to strive to maintain their reputation and it should provide workers be able to provide feedback back to requester ...higher skilled/more reputable worker bids $0.15, and in the auction their reputation gets them a 1x multiplier, turning that bid into $0.15. The task goes to th
    10 KB (1,656 words) - 22:51, 18 March 2015
  • ...ssigned a bid modifier based on their skill in the problem-class and their reputation (or lack there of). For example, if we know from prior data that workers of - Worker William is brand new and has no reputation. He would like $0.10 per classification task. However, knowing that - on av
    2 KB (315 words) - 22:52, 18 March 2015
  • ...encourage Ws to help other users of the platform in order to build a solid reputation, as with users on various forums. ...udos_%E2%80%93_Reputation_Point_System Milestone 3 Trust Idea 2: Kudos – Reputation Point System]] - http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/posts/gLP8kMCh79vZ5Botv
    8 KB (1,314 words) - 23:20, 18 March 2015
  • A site-wide point-based reputation system for workers will help instill trust among requesters and workers ali
    583 B (93 words) - 20:29, 18 March 2015
  • *The middle-man, besides gaining a margin and reputation, supervises the worker with his/her expertise.
    4 KB (692 words) - 11:42, 18 March 2015
  • *The middle-man, besides gaining a margin and reputation, supervises the worker with his/her expertise.
    1 KB (194 words) - 11:35, 18 March 2015
  • ...that they understand the goal of the task and avoid errors to keep up the reputation (Refer last point of Worker needs in Milestone 3)
    2 KB (369 words) - 11:20, 18 March 2015
  • ...jected to re-evaluation for rejection, he knows that it will cost him time/reputation to reject in haste or without a genuine reason, so the requester will be fa
    2 KB (304 words) - 10:44, 18 March 2015
  • ...(Not the facebook kind J) to establish the definition of expertise, beyond reputation and perception. Once expertise/competency has been devined (as a quality qu
    4 KB (666 words) - 23:06, 18 March 2015
  • ...y to Cold War MAD philosophy is germaine; the threat to destroy the others reputation, while distasteful is an effective way to minimize ethical/moral transgress
    4 KB (640 words) - 22:06, 18 March 2015
  • ...worker can be given one chance to withdraw his work without affecting his reputation. (Haven’t thought this feature through.)
    12 KB (2,025 words) - 07:16, 19 March 2015
  • ...newcomers. They have to depend a lot on luck to be able to build their own reputation on the system. If they get accepted by requesters who are generous enough t ...s reputation points for being a requester as well as being a worker. These reputation points can later translate into monetary earnings, thus benefitting the use
    5 KB (863 words) - 07:16, 19 March 2015
  • ...ester has a low rating. The workers are given power to affect the worker's reputation by providing feedback and ratings. *A good reputation for a requester will lead to better visiblity on the HIT list.
    3 KB (542 words) - 03:42, 19 March 2015
  • Having search based on requesters reputation would increase the trust of worker ---> requester. So we need to give worke By having a contract-based system, penalizing the requester "Reputation" for unjustified rejection and enabling micro-contracts between worker and
    16 KB (2,520 words) - 01:37, 19 March 2015
  • Having search based on requesters reputation would increase the trust of worker ---> requester. So we need to give worke
    3 KB (397 words) - 23:35, 18 March 2015
  • ...workers on AMT who spend a considerable amount of time slowly accumulating reputation on the site by doing jobs. However, beyond whatever respect these people ge
    3 KB (457 words) - 22:27, 18 March 2015
  • ...the requesters should bear the consequences severely. This can include bad reputation and thus less power and privilege related to posting work in the future. Th
    3 KB (500 words) - 21:49, 18 March 2015
  • ...motivate and reward the workers? How might we provide them credentials and reputation? '''Reputation, Transparency and Incentive'''
    13 KB (1,989 words) - 08:20, 17 January 2016
  • ...es of Collective Intelligence Framework, Malone etal 2010] have shown that Reputation, Incentives, and Motivation play a big role in developing sustainable crowd * How might we increase the '''reputation of requestors'''?
    3 KB (422 words) - 05:37, 12 July 2015
  • ...es of Collective Intelligence Framework, Malone etal 2010] have shown that Reputation, Incentives, and Motivation play a big role in developing sustainable crowd * How might we increase the '''reputation of requestors'''?
    2 KB (340 words) - 05:38, 12 July 2015
  • ...ester has a low rating. The workers are given power to affect the worker's reputation by providing feedback and ratings. *A good reputation for a requester will lead to better visiblity on the HIT list.
    3 KB (542 words) - 03:08, 19 March 2015
  • ...ssigned a bid modifier based on their skill in the problem-class and their reputation (or lack there of). For example, if we know from prior data that workers of - Worker William is brand new and has no reputation. He would like $0.10 per classification task. However, knowing that - on av
    2 KB (315 words) - 22:46, 18 March 2015
  • ...ester has a low rating. The workers are given power to affect the worker's reputation by providing feedback and ratings. *A good reputation for a requester will lead to better visiblity on the HIT list.
    3 KB (542 words) - 03:04, 19 March 2015
  • *The possibility of misusing the system to improve the requester’s reputation by fixing HITs with a worker in-exchange for a good review.
    1 KB (202 words) - 11:43, 18 March 2015
  • ...ted to mass rejection, or cases which involve requester/worker with a poor reputation
    2 KB (326 words) - 01:23, 19 March 2015
  • ...get to pay a fee to all workers that submitted something and the workers' reputation will not be influenced. ...ected without obtaining any reason from requesters. This also causes their reputation to go down.
    2 KB (303 words) - 12:23, 17 March 2015
  • ...lp in developing trust among workers about working for any requester. This reputation system is monitored both by the platform host/admin and the workers. (Eg: T # Based on requester's reputation and previous achievements
    4 KB (675 words) - 06:54, 18 March 2015
  • # The worker is given some additional reputation points for the same
    618 B (101 words) - 10:29, 17 March 2015
  • A priority system (like in DoTA2) in which a requester or worker with bad reputation/complaints or malpractices will be pushed to a low prioirty band for a dura
    398 B (63 words) - 10:09, 17 March 2015
  • ...d. They become risk-averse when a task might be confusing and affect their reputation or payment. ...m: Workers output rejected on loose grounds. Results in lowering of worker reputation. requester not affected by gray reviews.
    14 KB (2,305 words) - 01:41, 19 March 2015
  • ...d. They become risk-averse when a task might be confusing and affect their reputation or payment.
    1 KB (227 words) - 22:05, 18 March 2015
  • * Cheaters should be punished for which a two-sided and somewhat complex reputation system is needed. ...ation, feedback, and pay. These may be addressed by mechanisms to maintain reputation, provide better interaction with requesters, and increase motivation.
    11 KB (1,784 words) - 22:49, 18 March 2015
  • ...a permanent rejection mark on the profile of the worker and affects their reputation for other jobs. Workers should be able to know why they got rejected, if t
    2 KB (287 words) - 14:09, 18 March 2015
  • ** Need for a reputation score. * Reputation System (Stackoverflow like)
    8 KB (1,243 words) - 17:17, 18 March 2015
  • A strong reputation system with strict rules can enforce both power and trust. By strict rules
    3 KB (461 words) - 16:58, 18 March 2015
  • ...d the proposed actions might minimize their repercussion on the worker’s reputation or confidence.
    844 B (138 words) - 17:01, 18 March 2015
  • *A two-sided and complex reputation system is needed to punish cheaters/improve
    4 KB (570 words) - 23:01, 18 March 2015
  • === Reputation: How might we design better reputation systems? ===
    13 KB (2,010 words) - 08:47, 21 March 2015
  • === REPUTATION: How might we design better reputation systems? === ...atings (reputation level) of the worker and the requester on the platform. Reputation level could be provided on the basis of lot of parameters, for instance, sk
    4 KB (679 words) - 19:54, 25 March 2015
  • The problem addressed here is how we are going to assign some reputation to the worker/requester so that there can be quality work available to the a) Our system is going to involve every worker/requester have two reputation bars connected to their profile, one is the experience bar, which tells us
    2 KB (369 words) - 19:45, 25 March 2015
  • Previous studies indicate that a reliable reputation system has an impact on the matching process of tasks and workers (Karger u This paper examines the interdependencies of wages, reputation/performance and quality of workers and suggests theoretical concepts to cha
    7 KB (1,093 words) - 01:39, 8 February 2016
  • ====Reputation==== All the ideas presented under the theme of "Reputation" have the underlying approach of ranking the workers according to their ski
    4 KB (652 words) - 22:43, 25 March 2015
  • All the ideas presented under the theme of "Reputation" have the underlying approach of ranking the workers according to their ski
    631 B (106 words) - 22:51, 25 March 2015
  • and good reputation / but sense its just a beginning. Worker could became a community manager.
    3 KB (500 words) - 00:36, 8 February 2016
  • == Reputation == [[Milestone 4 Opera Reputation: Karma Points]] http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/posts/66RWifCqASfZPyCer
    3 KB (491 words) - 12:44, 25 March 2015
  • === Reputation: To design a better reputation system === [[Milestone 4 PNPVirtualMachine: Dynamic Reputation]]
    2 KB (384 words) - 22:36, 25 March 2015
  • ...s required. Each skill category has certain hierarchy which will build the reputation of the worker in it. The worker can move up the levels to get tasks which a ...ble to move up the ranks rather quickly. He should be able to build up the reputation in an easy way once he gets through the evaluation phases.
    2 KB (397 words) - 22:28, 25 March 2015
  • The three themes that our team chose were Reputation, Results and Empathy. We compared and contrasted ideas under each theme bas === Theme 1 : Reputation ===
    4 KB (701 words) - 22:19, 25 March 2015
  • ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    2 KB (280 words) - 07:45, 25 March 2015
  • #Building up reputation in the worker community, etc
    1 KB (196 words) - 21:40, 25 March 2015
  • === Reputation === [[Milestone 4 RATH Reputation: Public Ratings System]] Provide public quantitative and qualitative feedba
    2 KB (295 words) - 22:39, 25 March 2015
  • 1 KB (145 words) - 22:24, 25 March 2015
  • * Maybe they have a reputation/given a reputation amount by the Requester ...heirs (there are multiple groups of workers who are organised based on the reputation)
    984 B (164 words) - 19:38, 25 March 2015
  • ...s a Priority System in which resolution cases of requester/worker with bad reputation are pushed to low priority while one of the other idea suggests using a hum ...that worker's reputation and give this responsibility with workers of high reputation) who is responsible for improving task clarity in return for a higher payme
    14 KB (2,258 words) - 00:44, 26 March 2015
  • ...n before it exits the quarantine for deployment could be selected based on reputation or elected by the community. This way a set of people of represent the comm
    5 KB (856 words) - 06:38, 27 March 2015
  • '''Reputation: How might we design better reputation systems?''' ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    4 KB (603 words) - 22:59, 25 March 2015
  • ...ranteed a high quality of results, and would like some KPI to evaluate the reputation of a worker (@seku). ...st to achieve 5 star mono-dimensional recognition, if many cases, leads to reputation inflation (Horton 2015) or threatened retaliation and has also lead to the
    10 KB (1,525 words) - 08:20, 8 February 2016
  • === Reputation === * Better reputation = better workers, better results = build reputation through facilitating resolution.
    2 KB (254 words) - 18:24, 24 March 2015
  • '''Problem''': Without a reputation system, Workers don't know who is safe to work for and Requesters don't kno
    901 B (142 words) - 18:24, 24 March 2015
  • ...good payment history. Paying at the earliest also increases the requesters reputation.
    367 B (60 words) - 15:37, 25 March 2015
  • === Reputation === How might we design better reputation systems?
    3 KB (455 words) - 22:23, 25 March 2015
  • Frequent mention of skill ratings in most of the reputation ideas, but not very many details on how these skills are assessed.
    1 KB (168 words) - 22:14, 25 March 2015
  • ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    2 KB (280 words) - 08:47, 22 March 2015
  • ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    2 KB (280 words) - 20:47, 25 March 2015
  • ...out to other areas of work without barriers or fear of it affecting their reputation rating in the crowdsourcing marketplace. Workers want timely, relevant oppo
    4 KB (658 words) - 05:53, 8 February 2016
  • === Reputation === ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    2 KB (294 words) - 22:25, 25 March 2015
  • ...ssumption that insights from usability testing are linked to concepts like reputation, motivation, performance, trust, etc.'''
    2 KB (242 words) - 22:31, 25 March 2015
  • === Reputation: How might we design better reputation systems? === === Reputation: How might we design better reputation systems? ===
    1 KB (142 words) - 08:20, 17 January 2016
  • ...ateRanking is one of the parameters that determines the requestor's global reputation. The parameter has positive weights if maximum number of requestors use the ...plates & rubrics with the community, earn rewards, and further enhance his reputation. Other requestors and workers can vote on the high quality templates. An a
    6 KB (816 words) - 05:37, 12 July 2015
  • ...es of Collective Intelligence Framework, Malone etal 2010] have shown that Reputation plays a big role in developing sustainable crowd sourcing communities. Ther ...rsify the risk involved in the crowdsourcing work.''' We propose following reputation based portfolio [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversification_%28finance%29
    3 KB (464 words) - 05:37, 12 July 2015
  • === REPUTATION === [[Milestone 4 UWI Reputation: User Profile]]
    3 KB (483 words) - 17:18, 24 March 2015
  • ...rson, offers the path to meet this person in real the world and proves the reputation and skills of a worker. Empathy and Reputation:
    2 KB (353 words) - 18:15, 26 March 2015
  • ...point system is shown on the right of the image. The points represent the reputation and working ability of this person. Once a worker has enough points, his/he Empathy and Reputation:
    3 KB (493 words) - 18:14, 26 March 2015
  • === REPUTATION === # Transparency is vital in building reputation for both worker and requester. A worker works with assurance if he/she whom
    2 KB (343 words) - 20:17, 25 March 2015
  • [[File:Reputation.JPG]]
    231 B (38 words) - 20:08, 25 March 2015
  • === Reputation === - more tasks available for those who have higher reputation
    3 KB (409 words) - 23:30, 25 March 2015
  • ...hird party the task should be taken down and it should mark the requesters reputation.
    3 KB (545 words) - 07:01, 24 March 2015
  • ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    2 KB (280 words) - 05:46, 25 March 2015
  • ...ccessful as long as there is no kind of “discrimination” on grounds of reputation of the worker. ...l not be able to pay less just because the worker has a comparitively poor reputation or the worker is new. This way the new workers will be able to establish th
    13 KB (2,172 words) - 18:54, 25 March 2015
  • * Based on the reputation of the worker, the submitted HITs are reviewed for quality ...view policy''' : High reputation workers will review HITs submitted by low reputation workers and vice-versa
    873 B (130 words) - 07:48, 25 March 2015
  • == Reputation == A reputation system is a must for any crowdsourcing platform as it provides the required
    3 KB (465 words) - 22:54, 25 March 2015
  • === THEME 3 : Reputation === '''How might we design better reputation systems?'''
    6 KB (962 words) - 22:22, 25 March 2015
  • '''How might we design better reputation systems?''' So, a reputation system is necessary to provide an efficient mechanism to choose the desired
    4 KB (701 words) - 07:31, 25 March 2015
  • ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    10 KB (1,647 words) - 22:04, 25 March 2015
  • 385 B (48 words) - 21:53, 1 April 2015
  • We selected [[Milestone 4 Opera Reputation: Karma Points]] idea from milestone 4 to do storyboarding:
    1 KB (203 words) - 22:05, 1 April 2015
  • ...rove this model is to add in a social interaction aspect, and a way to use reputation to select the reviewers. ** '''Secondly, this problem can be cleverly offset by reducing reputation by some amount every time a reviewer says that the monetary compensation is
    2 KB (404 words) - 20:25, 1 April 2015
  • === Note: Experienced workers are those who have higher reputation in the community === === Note: Reputation points can also be considered for an expert answering such queries.(Similar
    2 KB (224 words) - 23:09, 1 April 2015
  • [[Milestone 5 TuringMachine Mockup: Sustainable Reputation Mechanism]] [[Milestone 5 TuringMachine Storyboard: Sustainable Reputation Mechanism]].
    546 B (56 words) - 01:28, 2 April 2015
  • ...es of Collective Intelligence Framework, Malone etal 2010] have shown that Reputation plays a big role in developing sustainable crowd sourcing communities. Ther ...rsify the risk involved in the crowdsourcing work.''' We propose following reputation based portfolio [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversification_%28finance%29
    5 KB (678 words) - 05:36, 12 July 2015
  • ...es of Collective Intelligence Framework, Malone etal 2010] have shown that Reputation plays a big role in developing sustainable crowd sourcing communities. Ther ...rsify the risk involved in the crowdsourcing work.''' We propose following reputation based portfolio [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversification_%28finance%29
    5 KB (678 words) - 19:01, 5 April 2015
  • The idea used was "Mutual Rating(Reputation)". -> A novice will have to be given a head-start for acquiring reputation.
    2 KB (298 words) - 13:23, 1 April 2015
  • 6- Zhang, Yu, and Mihaela van der Schaar. "Reputation-based incentive protocols in crowdsourcing applications." INFOCOM, 2012 Pro
    8 KB (1,140 words) - 22:43, 10 April 2015
  • ...ably big number of downvotes as compared to the upvotes. Such a worker’s reputation will be affected negatively. The platform has a Badge System where depending on reputation, the Worker and the Requester both receive a particular badge. The title of
    8 KB (1,309 words) - 15:23, 8 April 2015
  • ...and trusted, they need feedback from requesters to get more HITs and gain reputation. This calls for an accurate exposure of their skills and qualifications for
    17 KB (2,566 words) - 20:29, 8 April 2015
  • ...and trusted, they need feedback from requesters to get more HITs and gain reputation. This calls for an accurate exposure of their skills and qualifications for
    17 KB (2,617 words) - 20:31, 8 April 2015
  • ...ertise is not who your are, but how you do it (well, timely) and requestor reputation is founded not on anecdotes, but on an index of measurable criteria. #Han Yu, Zhiqi Shen, Chunyan Miao, and Bo An. 2013. A reputation-aware decision-making approach for improving the efficiency of crowdsourcin
    8 KB (1,284 words) - 00:01, 9 April 2015
  • '''Trust Rank, Sustainable Reputation Framework for the Volatile Crowdsourcing Marketplace''' ...ticipants in different tranches, risk buckets. The ecosystem around the ''reputation score'' helps sustain the trust level by rewarding good practices and punis
    23 KB (3,247 words) - 01:50, 18 September 2015
  • ...point system is shown on the right of the image. The points represent the reputation and working ability of this person. Once a worker has enough points, his/he
    13 KB (2,083 words) - 15:34, 8 April 2015
  • Existing Crowdsourcing platforms do not enforce strong importance on the reputation of both - the workers and the employers. Employers are forced to assign wor ...lementing a crowdsourcing platform which increases the transparency of the reputation of all users of the platform. Primarily, this paper focuses on highlighting
    7 KB (1,074 words) - 23:09, 8 April 2015
  • ...tain better quality of work on crowdsourcing platforms, which enhances the reputation of such systems. In order to create trust, workers and requesters need to b ...n about the results, this will have a negative influence on the mentor’s reputation. With this mentoring system, new workers will have an easier start, trust c
    9 KB (1,428 words) - 14:26, 8 April 2015
  • ...the results of biased workers. There have been attempts made at creating a reputation system as well.
    6 KB (1,019 words) - 07:53, 8 April 2015
  • A Dynamic Reputation profiler ...spects of trust between the workers and the requesters through a system of reputation profiles. The motivation behind such a system is the sense of frustration w
    4 KB (750 words) - 11:09, 15 April 2015
  • 6- Zhang, Yu, and Mihaela van der Schaar. "Reputation-based incentive protocols in crowdsourcing applications." INFOCOM, 2012 Pro
    10 KB (1,490 words) - 00:48, 16 April 2015
  • *Github Style “Issue” Tracker for every HIT + Reputation + Private Messaging
    7 KB (1,138 words) - 22:56, 15 April 2015
  • '''Trust Rank, Sustainable Reputation Framework for the Crowdsourcing Marketplace''' ...ticipants in different tranches, risk buckets. The ecosystem around the ''reputation score'' helps sustain the trust level by rewarding good practices and punis
    28 KB (4,036 words) - 11:13, 2 September 2015
  • ...point system is shown on the right of the image. The points represent the reputation and working ability of this person. Once a worker has enough points, his/he
    14 KB (2,363 words) - 21:19, 14 April 2015
  • ...obtain better quality of work on crowdsourcing platforms and enhances the reputation of such systems. In order to create trust, workers and requesters need to b ...n about the results, this will have a negative influence on the mentor’s reputation. With this mentoring system, new workers will have an easier start, trust c
    11 KB (1,694 words) - 11:28, 15 April 2015
  • Workers/Requesters also gain "trust points" (similar to reputation) according to their work. They have points for social activities and for wo
    5 KB (848 words) - 22:43, 22 April 2015
  • ##Reputation and skills evaluations, bidding systems (If employing games/crowdfunding to
    12 KB (1,771 words) - 22:10, 24 April 2015
  • ....edu/w/index.php?title=Milestone_7_TuringMachine ''Trust Rank, Sustainable Reputation Framework for the Crowdsourcing Marketplace''] ....edu/w/index.php?title=Milestone_7_TuringMachine ''Trust Rank, Sustainable Reputation Framework for the Crowdsourcing Marketplace'']
    4 KB (549 words) - 16:13, 29 January 2016
  • ....edu/w/index.php?title=Milestone_7_TuringMachine ''Trust Rank, Sustainable Reputation Framework for the Crowdsourcing Marketplace''] ....edu/w/index.php?title=Milestone_7_TuringMachine ''Trust Rank, Sustainable Reputation Framework for the Crowdsourcing Marketplace'']
    4 KB (546 words) - 19:25, 22 April 2015
  • ...''PEAK (PErformance Alpha Kaizen)''', a comprehensive human and algo-based reputation system that is tied to the overall improvement and sustainability of the ul ...nation of human and algo feedback. It could be robust enough to prevent “reputation inflation”.
    9 KB (1,420 words) - 00:20, 11 May 2015
  • ...rianism, sense of fair compensation for effort, and largely machine-driven reputation mechanisms supported by limited subjective human input. ..., are used to suggest an appropriate 'peer' base to audit the HIT. ie. the reputation should inform us of more traits than specific 'skill tiers' while recognizi
    11 KB (1,691 words) - 10:54, 16 May 2015
  • * Issue of reputation system, pressurizing crowdworker (rating, etc.) as explained in [http://cro - He finds "almighty carrot", a 4 months old guild with high reputation from the crowdworkers ("quality of life" akin to rate my job) and requester
    11 KB (1,804 words) - 16:40, 21 February 2016
  • ...oiding the satisfaction-payment, and making the worker to risk to lose her reputation in the AMT system (after 5 rejections your possibilities of addressing HITs
    16 KB (2,784 words) - 04:46, 24 January 2016
  • ...newcomers. They have to depend a lot on luck to be able to build their own reputation on the system. If they get accepted by requesters who are generous enough t ...s reputation points for being a requester as well as being a worker. These reputation points can later translate into monetary earnings, thus benefitting the use
    5 KB (863 words) - 00:09, 19 March 2015
  • *Angela's main interest is Reputation and secondary interested is learning groups *Angela, what questions could you answer toward reputation within our current implementation of Daemo? Is there any improvements to Da
    1 KB (226 words) - 15:12, 15 November 2015
  • Other elements to Daemo's reputation system: ...e does a bad job, perhaps it could reflect in both worker x and worker y's reputation
    3 KB (561 words) - 16:56, 3 August 2015
  • * Eleni Koutrouli and Aphrodite Tsalgatidou. 2015. Reputation Systems Evaluation Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 48, 3, Article 35 (December 20 *8. Reputation System: http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=WinterMileston
    5 KB (607 words) - 04:31, 15 February 2016
  • *2. Expertise and Competency expectation/standardization (Reputation/Trust). Can guilds solve the ironic relationship between pricing and skill
    4 KB (663 words) - 05:50, 8 February 2016
  • As a worker, how can I build a reputation to have access at best remunerated jobs, how can I learn the best practices
    3 KB (417 words) - 13:48, 17 February 2016
  • * Reputation Idea : [[WinterMilestone_3_PierreF_ReputationIdea_BayesianMultiScoring]]
    589 B (54 words) - 14:58, 21 February 2016
  • ...nce buzz. A sampling of the foundational items on the delivery calendar: Reputation (Internal/External), Pricing, UX, Skills Matrix. The LB will coordinate th
    6 KB (959 words) - 06:46, 24 July 2015
  • ...acceptable to them based on pricing and conditions of work. The impact of reputation can be avoided is required. ...alienation of the workers from the requestors. The current state of the ‘reputation’ used has several flaws that do not help the issue of rejections being hi
    8 KB (1,295 words) - 22:21, 11 March 2015
  • ...name and a description of the idea itself (ex: [[Milestone 4 YourTeamName Reputation: Leveling System for Workers Leading to Better Wages]]). Once done, post a
    2 KB (305 words) - 12:06, 25 March 2015
  • ...By using this method, we're able to ensure that we're addressing both the reputation and quality issues without creating friction within the community. ...l is influenced by the asymmetry in power, information access, pricing and reputation of Mturk. It is pervasive and the impulse is to correct the injustice; for
    20 KB (3,297 words) - 15:04, 21 February 2016
  • ...for five star ratings, giving a lot of people an inflated reputation or a reputation that they do not deserve. Any system similar to this will work, but a syste
    937 B (161 words) - 23:40, 3 August 2015
  • ...le, a person going into their first programming task should not have their reputation based on their task translating English to Spanish. ...on relevance and then they find a weighted average which is the predicted reputation system for the new category.
    6 KB (865 words) - 00:42, 29 July 2015
  • == Reputation and Incentive-related Links == #A computational model of trust and reputation [http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.116.6001]
    84 KB (10,712 words) - 04:30, 17 January 2016
  • [['''''REPUTATION SYSTEMS''''']]
    2 KB (260 words) - 16:35, 31 January 2016
  • [['''''REPUTATION SYSTEMS''''']]
    1,010 B (147 words) - 16:43, 31 January 2016
  • [['''''REPUTATION SYSTEMS''''']]
    1 KB (196 words) - 16:39, 31 January 2016
  • ...s run throughs for reputation simulations found [https://github.com/rcompt/Reputation-Simulation here] ...time iteration, new workers and requesters were added, all starting with a reputation of 0
    6 KB (1,009 words) - 13:24, 21 August 2015
  • ...r until they finish some minimum number of tasks or until they build their reputation because there are chances that somebody can join the platform for fun and c
    1 KB (249 words) - 10:43, 6 August 2015
  • ...how the score will be used on the system. It may be compatible with other reputation systems. This proposal is an attempt at crowd sourcing the reputation system.
    2 KB (276 words) - 18:58, 7 August 2015
  • Xiwang's reputation system using Game Theory ==Summary of Game Reputation System==
    2 KB (275 words) - 22:55, 6 August 2015
  • == Some Reputation System Ideas == ...given time can help prevent sudden drops in reputation, especially if said reputation ranking can affect future pay and tasks.
    2 KB (401 words) - 16:16, 4 August 2015
  • ...ge for this milestone, please go [http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/category/reputation-system here]. ...idea is that greatly increases reputation coverage (number of workers with reputation in the platform) regardless of the quantity of hired workers in any given
    3 KB (481 words) - 20:45, 10 August 2015
  • ...ion with other proposed ideas. I'm not trying to deviate previous posts on reputation, I just wanted to provide some different ideas instead of reiterating over *Adapt reputation systems from gaming to account for average skill. Allows for a comparison o
    7 KB (1,278 words) - 11:56, 7 August 2015
  • This page describes a design and implementation strategy for Daemo's reputation system based on our brainstorms this week and over the past few months. Wri ...√ rating; we could think of something unique)... '''''Or if we want 100% reputation coverage''''' on all tasks, we can resort to peer review for rating the rem
    18 KB (2,823 words) - 03:27, 31 August 2015
  • ...ester has a low rating. The workers are given power to affect the worker's reputation by providing feedback and ratings. *A good reputation for a requester will lead to better visiblity on the HIT list.
    3 KB (542 words) - 00:54, 19 March 2015
  • ==Reputation System:== ...ith information on a workers skill level and quality through the boomerang reputation system?
    12 KB (1,842 words) - 05:27, 16 November 2015
  • == Reputation Sys == ....edu/w/index.php?title=Relevant_Work#Reputation-related_Links_and_Articles Reputation-related Links and Articles]
    9 KB (1,333 words) - 22:40, 19 April 2016
  • ...s such as average wage and past performance on similar tasks. However, the reputation scores are '''not public'''. This addresses some core issues of traditional
    1 KB (213 words) - 03:15, 6 August 2015
  • [[Rijul Magu Reputation System Idea]] ...ch other secretly, not revealing their ratings to each other (furthermore, reputation scores are internal- not viewable by the community members) mitigates some
    2 KB (390 words) - 01:32, 18 August 2015
  • ...system works.It does a comparison between internet based reputation versus reputation system of the traditional systems. ...of quality by those who own them. The product, not the retailer, wins the reputation.
    7 KB (1,194 words) - 09:51, 31 July 2015
  • =Content-Driven Reputation for Collaborative Systems= ...according to how their contributions fare; users whose work is undone lose reputation. This system does not require users to express judgments on one another.
    7 KB (1,199 words) - 09:30, 30 July 2015
  • ...aper describes about how reciprocity plays an important role in building a reputation system . The author has done analysis on 3 data sets that is amazon.com , e # Reciprocity generally helps in building reputation system.
    1 KB (246 words) - 21:05, 31 July 2015
  • <strong>Welcome to the wiki for the Daemo Reputation System!</strong> == Factors affecting the reputation system ==
    9 KB (1,323 words) - 20:43, 10 August 2015
  • - Effect of ratings on others reputation <br> - Concern over the effects of rating on a person's profile and reputation: Users generally refrained from giving a negative reference since it would
    8 KB (1,382 words) - 01:06, 31 July 2015
  • Reputation systems are widely used for instilling trust among the participants. A reputation system for an online labor market computes a reputation score for each
    10 KB (1,497 words) - 10:34, 31 July 2015
  • '''Summary of the reputation system''' *View profile page containing worker reputation elements at https://www.freelancer.com.au/u/BRD11.html
    3 KB (522 words) - 06:00, 2 August 2015
  • '''Workers' and requesters' reputation ratings linked directly to each skill area rather than an aggregate rating
    1 KB (241 words) - 16:23, 3 August 2015
  • ...ith @arichmondfuller we can help new workers gain their first feedback and reputation by allowing them to do jobs for charities and NGOs. ...an in administrative expenses. On the other hand, new workers need to gain reputation within the platform in order to improve their profile. We can help both par
    1 KB (216 words) - 17:41, 3 August 2015
  • Following ideas from Fivver and Upwork, we believe it is key for reputation to show how much a worker takes to execute a particular task. See example p
    507 B (89 words) - 21:10, 2 August 2015
  • ==Skills-based element to the reputation system== ...pment materials would be highlighted to complete in order to gain further reputation points. If we give people the tools to improve the overall quality of the w
    2 KB (351 words) - 18:21, 7 August 2015
  • 2. starts free but puts the worker in a path of improved reputation with pay (becoming a Task Moderator). Every Task Moderator starts this way. ...lizing the task description?'''" This is a question that helps improve the reputation of a deserving applicant and puts the applicant in a path towards being a (
    3 KB (455 words) - 04:33, 7 June 2015
  • ...ther ideas, this suggests that together reach a solution fairly, and let's reputation workers increase. [[File:EdiSon.png| 400px|center| thumb| Fig 2. how reputation is evalued on the plataform? ]]
    3 KB (402 words) - 20:46, 3 June 2015
  • ...ip board is the choice where the board members are selected based on their reputation and efforts to lead the community.
    3 KB (434 words) - 13:43, 5 June 2015
  • ...e an important measure of every worker's professional expertise.Hence, the reputation system must be a fair one, depending on not only one criteria but various q ...nterviews etc. This method can be paid or unpaid, depending on the mentor. Reputation badges or any other incentive may be given to the mentors.
    5 KB (832 words) - 14:01, 18 June 2015
  • ...e an important measure of every worker's professional expertise.Hence, the reputation system must be a fair one, depending on not only one criteria but various q ...nterviews etc. This method can be paid or unpaid, depending on the mentor. Reputation badges or any other incentive may be given to the mentors.
    5 KB (822 words) - 13:50, 18 June 2015
  • ...ems that are untrustworthy and insensitive to cultural and gender bias and reputation systems that are unduly shaped by the social psychology of public/private f ...e biases and fraud of bi-lateral feedback and mitigate reciprocity induced reputation inflation through data and algorithmic matching.
    5 KB (702 words) - 02:52, 21 June 2015
  • ...r to do these Milestones free of cost. They will be able to build up their reputation right from beginning, even if they are not assigned work.
    3 KB (420 words) - 08:07, 18 June 2015
  • #Summary of the reputation system #Summary of the reputation system
    16 KB (2,488 words) - 21:37, 8 August 2015
  • Papers related to reputation systems and a summary of the pros and cons of the implementation. ===Reputation Inflation: Evidence from an Online Labor Market [http://econweb.tamu.edu/co
    44 KB (6,989 words) - 20:37, 10 August 2015
  • We are planning to integrating collaborative way of building reputation for workers and requesters. ...prove their reputation. The integration of all these foundation ideas like Reputation System, Recommendation System and Feedback System is our main idea.
    5 KB (801 words) - 21:10, 8 April 2015
  • ...hird party the task should be taken down and it should mark the requesters reputation.
    803 B (135 words) - 15:32, 23 March 2015
  • ...l is influenced by the asymmetry in power, information access, pricing and reputation of Mturk. It is pervasive and the impulse is to correct the injustice; for ...ster reputation whims, they are protected behind a veil, by the collective reputation of the guild. This Protection allows for a freer exchange of information,
    12 KB (1,812 words) - 13:08, 21 February 2016
  • (1) flawed reputation systems which do not accurately reflect
    6 KB (1,040 words) - 18:30, 17 January 2016
  • ...orkers can try out all combinations such as view time and reputation, only reputation, only time and so on. ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform is expected to yield better res
    9 KB (1,484 words) - 17:55, 20 March 2016
  • ...he payment need not be monetary. We could “pay” them in terms of their reputation rankings and so on. ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform is expected to yield better res
    12 KB (2,114 words) - 18:58, 27 March 2016
  • ...who is ranked lower. This would motivate the workers to jump higher in the reputation rankings. ...promotions are also pretty automatic (higher ranked) and would manifest as reputation within the system.
    27 KB (4,624 words) - 12:58, 4 April 2016
  • ...below the expectations, then his reputation decreases. This fluctuation in reputation directly impacts his pay. They are ranked relatively based on this, and peo
    3 KB (557 words) - 17:06, 17 April 2016
  • -'''The Single Requestor Penalty''': Worker reputation might easily be punished by one reuqestor, which makes it impossible to mee
    12 KB (1,777 words) - 07:35, 18 January 2016
  • ...ystem''' is a very impressive way of rating which reduces the inflation of reputation score.
    9 KB (1,428 words) - 16:19, 17 January 2016
  • ...em that don't accurately reflect worker and requester quality -> Boomerang reputation system *I agree the reputation system needs work and I do like the Boomerang system, but I think it's impo
    6 KB (1,030 words) - 19:21, 17 January 2016
  • ...eputation .While working with other crowdsourcing applications i found the reputation of a worker was neither monitored or analyzed. Daemo easily solves the prob
    4 KB (622 words) - 11:37, 17 January 2016
  • ...w standard (the next de-facto platform), Daemo which includes Boomerang, a reputation system that introduces alignment between ratings and likelihood of collabor ...of a new standard in crowdsourcing platforms with the help of boomerang, a reputation system that aligns the ratings the worker or requester receives and the lik
    7 KB (1,059 words) - 20:02, 17 January 2016
  • ...s very promising. It provides a sound solution to the very real problem of reputation tracking and management. On this system, using the ratings allows for reque
    6 KB (1,008 words) - 18:06, 17 January 2016
  • ...y boomerang and prototyping tasks . The strength of Daemo is the boomerang reputation system which in someway forces the users to stay truthful to the rating ex
    3 KB (545 words) - 21:25, 17 January 2016
  • ** Flawed reputation systems which do not accurately reflect worker and requester quality * Boomerang (a reputation system)
    15 KB (2,341 words) - 17:49, 18 January 2016
  • * Workers gain reputation in the community as they contribute to the mturk HITs. More rewards results ...s) of this paper indicated that Daemo focused on improving the accuracy of reputation in the system, we still find it necessary for the system to take this issue
    10 KB (1,763 words) - 14:50, 17 January 2016
  • ...ort. Also it seems that a low score can easily have a huge impact on one's reputation. This system must be looked into and consider various aspects before gradin
    5 KB (881 words) - 19:53, 17 January 2016
  • * Boomerang reputation system is cleverly designed to ensure requesters and workers rate correctly ...rated them in recent past. This essentially means introduction of overall reputation also.
    7 KB (1,144 words) - 13:25, 17 January 2016
  • ...alues and can provide rewards to members at no cost, while contributing to reputation building.
    9 KB (1,414 words) - 21:06, 24 January 2016
  • * Good approach trying to solve the inflated reputation score and the disconnection between mental models.
    5 KB (776 words) - 02:08, 17 January 2016
  • * Fix for the problem of reputation.
    4 KB (620 words) - 11:47, 17 January 2016
  • ...based on accuracy in an Optical Character Recognition system makes sense; reputation is directly linked to quality of work - Acknowledges prevalent reputation inflation. Merely sorting and partnering highly ranked workers with highly
    4 KB (618 words) - 18:56, 17 January 2016
  • ...who is ranked lower. This would motivate the workers to jump higher in the reputation rankings. ...promotions are also pretty automatic (higher ranked) and would manifest as reputation within the system.
    18 KB (3,029 words) - 17:56, 3 April 2016
  • ...e limitations of other platforms and works on the two most important areas:reputation and task authorship, which is the essence of crowdsourcing platforms. * The Boomerang reputation system is a well-thought mechanism of evaluation , different from "traditio
    6 KB (977 words) - 13:45, 24 January 2016
  • ...em that don't accurately reflect worker and requester quality -> Boomerang reputation system
    3 KB (431 words) - 18:39, 17 January 2016
  • -This ties into credibility. If the user accurately describes/gives accurate reputation to another worker, that user is meant to be trusted because they know what ...This will allow them to be evaluated from workers and start off with some reputation. This gives people a sense of what level they are and how they can improve.
    5 KB (888 words) - 17:45, 17 January 2016
  • 3. Accuracy: Something like a reputation score for the users helps decide payments and trust results for the request
    6 KB (912 words) - 13:19, 17 January 2016
  • ...e platform. Daemo mitigates this concern by introducing '''Boomerang''', a reputation system that differs from traditional rate-and-leave systems by 'boomerangin ...] that Users are not just motivated by monetary benefits but also by their reputation among peers.
    13 KB (2,027 words) - 00:09, 18 January 2016
  • It is not clear from the article how the reputation score for a task is computed?
    9 KB (1,511 words) - 19:36, 17 January 2016
  • '''Boomerang''' addresses a reputation system that differs from traditional rate-and-leave systems by impacting bo
    12 KB (2,155 words) - 15:06, 16 January 2016
  • ...ing system called ''Boomerang'', that helps provide more accountability in reputation of users and also rank them.
    7 KB (1,141 words) - 06:15, 18 January 2016
  • ...t necessarily native english speakers, a low score can also decrease their reputation. This system must be looked into and consider various aspects before gradin - Boomerang reputation system that uses requesters’ ratings to influence which workers get early
    5 KB (809 words) - 19:43, 17 January 2016
  • The boomerang reputation system helps to ascertain that ratings are more authentic to what the user
    6 KB (958 words) - 14:06, 17 January 2016
  • # to avoid rejections on the reputation system # to have a buffer of points for reputation management
    14 KB (2,127 words) - 08:51, 22 January 2016
  • ...pleted without having to rework with the platform or think about requester reputation), true market pricing (priority order changes as per price), employment of ...de – a better interface (to reduce overheads, transaction costs), worker reputation system (to prevent rejection of genuinely completed tasks by having qualifi
    11 KB (1,708 words) - 15:26, 24 January 2016
  • * a good reputation system for workers
    7 KB (1,088 words) - 22:39, 24 January 2016
  • ...rly understand the instruction before hitting because it might effect your reputation. ...eir knowledge and other hardware or software restrictions, searching about reputation of the requesters, learn new skills, manage AMT work etc.
    21 KB (3,325 words) - 20:40, 24 January 2016
  • * Workers would benefit from a reputation system that was somewhat divorced from payment and also future opportunitie * Requesters need a reputation system that does not unfairly penalize 'good faith' attempts.
    11 KB (1,678 words) - 17:01, 23 January 2016
  • ...rios - very difficult to work back up the approval rates. Worker relies on reputation of the requesters - hesitant towards new requesters - tries assessing them * '''Reputation of requester''': Requesters try to maintain a good reputation about themselves to ensure good quality workers take up their tasks.
    14 KB (2,219 words) - 01:54, 25 January 2016
  • ...eral problems are stated when it comes to arguing on how to build a better reputation system for Mturk, as not allowing requesters to see the history of activiti ...etplace: The requester made a mistake and it severely affects the worker's reputation even though he is not to blame. Not only that, but it is also complicated f
    21 KB (3,516 words) - 22:09, 24 January 2016
  • Requesters need to know the reputation profiles of the workers. Not having this knowledge makes the requesters hav
    11 KB (1,814 words) - 19:50, 24 January 2016
  • * As a requester: it’s important to manage reputation as a requester as well. Requesters sometimes utilize forums (such as Turk N ...mes you are rejected. If you get rejected from too many hits it drops your reputation.
    8 KB (1,301 words) - 19:38, 24 January 2016
  • *As long as the work is done properly, the reputation of the worker simply does not matter.
    8 KB (1,277 words) - 11:13, 25 January 2016
  • ...ganization on the requester side. Requesters are also concerned with their reputation to be able to attract the best workers. So trust issues run both ways, and ...requester to be a mass provider without having already a well-established reputation.
    12 KB (1,845 words) - 21:08, 24 January 2016
  • * The current reputation system on MTurk is simply bad. “Number of complete HITs” and “approva ...area where they decide rejections. ''Interpretation'' : The Requester’s reputation (on online forums) depends on the number of unfair rejections they make, so
    14 KB (2,219 words) - 21:40, 24 January 2016
  • * Worker's reputation is very fragile * even few rejections will not allow workers to do highly p ...that do not risk approval rating (i.e. 99%) and requesters who have a good reputation.
    22 KB (3,675 words) - 01:34, 25 January 2016
  • *reputation of requesters also important to ensure good workers engage with your tasks
    14 KB (2,260 words) - 06:42, 25 January 2016
  • * Its quite difficult for requester to rely on reputation system to get quality work. So they create inconsistent automated test crit
    6 KB (912 words) - 10:05, 25 January 2016
  • ...communication with workers to leave a good impression and maintain a good reputation in order to attract good workers. *Reputation is weak and easily subverted.
    22 KB (3,488 words) - 19:22, 24 January 2016
  • * Workers give a lot of importance to reputation of requesters. * Requesters have to maintain their reputation.
    12 KB (1,972 words) - 13:46, 24 January 2016
  • ...nd see. Nobody wants to risk a mass rejection, which can be lethal for the reputation of the worker. ...he buyer in the MTurk market. So, indeed, there should not be a need for a reputation system for requesters, but the workers should be rated.
    11 KB (1,668 words) - 22:06, 24 January 2016
  • * People get affected when their work gets rejected. It also harms their reputation and it is hard to get chosen when their work has been rejected. This does n * need reputation
    17 KB (2,736 words) - 19:28, 24 January 2016
  • * Its quite difficult for requester to rely on reputation system to get quality work. So they create inconsistent automated test crit
    6 KB (912 words) - 10:07, 25 January 2016
  • ...ester’s side - how workers are allocated tasks after they are hired, how reputation is managed on the platform and how tasks are represented to workers. For ex * Lacks of a true and helpful reputation system for workers
    15 KB (2,229 words) - 18:27, 24 January 2016
  • ...eptical in picking tasks from new requestors as it would hurt their system reputation if the task is unethically rejected or considered spam. * Workers tend to avoid picking tasks from requestors that have a bad reputation that is spread through forums.
    9 KB (1,496 words) - 21:36, 24 January 2016
  • ...tes with turkers while processing HIT, i.e. answering their questions, the reputation of the Requester increases. The promptness of requester is a huge concern f ...rk they submit. Most of the present platforms try to address this issue by reputation scores which are highly inflated anyways.
    10 KB (1,546 words) - 21:26, 24 January 2016
  • ''A True Reputation System for Workers * No reputation system for workers hence unreliable and no assurance of high quality result
    14 KB (2,108 words) - 09:39, 24 January 2016
  • ** What do workers value more, reputation or flexibility? ** Current reputation system is easy to manipulate, and it is frustrating for requesters to ensur
    24 KB (3,881 words) - 09:10, 25 January 2016
  • * A true worker reputation system. If a requester can't differentiate between a good and a bad worker, ...heir employer was so that his work wont be rejected and it wont affect his reputation score. Laura, only works tasks as long as she is sure that any new task wou
    13 KB (2,223 words) - 19:12, 24 January 2016
  • ** Workers tend to stick to requesters with a safer/better reputation in terms of accepting hits
    10 KB (1,618 words) - 20:08, 24 January 2016
  • - Built in reputation of requester - want good workers to engage in your task * Workers need more a reputation system that doesn't rely on refusal of payment
    21 KB (3,479 words) - 17:52, 24 January 2016
  • * Workers have a reputation System * Requesters don't have a reputation system
    14 KB (2,185 words) - 15:06, 24 January 2016
  • ...putation on the platform, since it the equivalent of a credit score. A bad reputation might well destroy their career on that platform. This also opens doors to
    13 KB (2,100 words) - 10:16, 25 January 2016
  • * Requesters are less concerned about reputation on AMT than workers are.
    7 KB (1,132 words) - 17:15, 24 January 2016
  • *Reputation Idea 01 (http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=WinterMileston *Reputation Idea 02 (http://crowdresearch.stanford.edu/w/index.php?title=WinterMileston
    999 B (134 words) - 17:48, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation : Idea 01 - Applying "Filters" to Task Feed ===
    1 KB (212 words) - 17:35, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation : Idea 02 - Testimonial recommendations in the form of “Reviews” ===
    945 B (152 words) - 17:39, 31 January 2016
  • ...er angle would be to technically integrate a skills matching tool into the reputation system so workers could get guidance on a development trajectory to supplem
    3 KB (466 words) - 05:19, 31 January 2016
  • ==Reputation== ===How to improve reputation system beyond Boomerang? ([[:Media:Daemo white paper (private).pdf|read thi
    8 KB (1,182 words) - 08:54, 31 January 2016
  • This dark horse idea is an exploration of a risky focus from my Reputation idea. The idea sprouted out of the concept of having an intermediary body t
    1 KB (184 words) - 19:20, 31 January 2016
  • ...stice HITs will receive the information from the case files as well as the reputation information from the respective parties.
    1 KB (202 words) - 19:56, 31 January 2016
  • ...stice HITs will receive the information from the case files as well as the reputation information from the respective parties.
    1 KB (203 words) - 19:24, 31 January 2016
  • The system I propose to improve the reputation experience on the Daemo platform is a clearinghouse format in which both th
    3 KB (419 words) - 20:00, 31 January 2016
  • ...the task. While it may restrict newcomers, it also allows workers with low reputation to participate in tasks that they normally wouldn't be eligible for, giving
    3 KB (572 words) - 09:46, 31 January 2016
  • ...of experience with the platform, level of participation in the community, reputation and other factors. Workers may vote to elect these arbitrator, and a moneta ...posted, requesters are shown a choice of judges to pick from, with their reputation and (more importantly) the number of tasks completed for them. '''Example''
    3 KB (493 words) - 09:46, 31 January 2016
  • ...f three design aspects, that attempt to solve needs related to - '''worker reputation''', '''matching requester and worker requirements''' and the '''high bar f We propose a referral based system that deals with the following reputation and relevant work issues:
    7 KB (1,167 words) - 09:46, 31 January 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te ...elated ideas to http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/category/wintermilestone-3-reputation-ideas and a link to each of your power-related ideas to http://crowdresearc
    3 KB (377 words) - 20:22, 30 January 2016
  • ...s, so on and so forth. All of these community activities will increase the reputation of the user and in turn trust amongst the users. And, probably help in gett ...and he can ask the submitter to resubmit it. This will give the user more reputation points.
    5 KB (816 words) - 16:36, 31 January 2016
  • == Reputation-related Idea == The idea is to improve the reputation system by introducing two new concepts:
    2 KB (324 words) - 12:28, 31 January 2016
  • ...y participated in the 'civic' duty will see a subsequent increase in their reputation, or in the provision of a badge. (This is akin to the kudos afforded people ...g to participate in the 'civic' duty) is rewarded through a small boost in reputation (this could be capped at some monthly increment of improvement, or some max
    2 KB (272 words) - 17:18, 29 January 2016
  • ...questor. Having specialized teams whose group members have almost the same reputation will ensure quality results. The process of submission will also speed up. * Similar skillsets & reputation with secondary factors like age/demographic/some common denominator.
    13 KB (2,129 words) - 18:56, 31 January 2016
  • ...sues raised by cohorts & requesters within Daemo. Every week, based on the reputation of worker as well as requester, sets of random jury are created. Different Each week, the requesters & workers who have a reputation greater than a particular value get assigned to Jury group. They are unawar
    3 KB (456 words) - 22:25, 31 January 2016
  • * Tooltip on the reputation of the requester
    3 KB (574 words) - 17:53, 31 January 2016
  • Below we'll list our darkhorse ideas for a reputation system that could increase both the quality and trust links between request Based on the reputation system's approaches delined on the white paper "Daemo: A Crowdsourced Crowd
    8 KB (1,289 words) - 18:14, 31 January 2016
  • Although all the workers are important, there is always a reputation system that can rank the different performances of workers. It means that t If we could combine the reputation and the previous approval of a requester; we can combine these two tools to
    4 KB (645 words) - 17:10, 31 January 2016
  • Daemo Points is suggestion for a Reputation system for the Daemo platform. ...l HITs, and penalize them for unsuccessful ones. The intended outcome is a reputation system in which good workers can get better HITs, and good requesters get m
    4 KB (683 words) - 17:09, 31 January 2016
  • *It is probably an idea that serves complimentary to other reputation measuring ideas.
    2 KB (376 words) - 17:52, 30 January 2016
  • ...work is measured through levels. Users level up and that determines their reputation. == Dynamic Pricing based on the user "skill" (reputation) for a specific task ==
    9 KB (1,554 words) - 20:01, 31 January 2016
  • * Not able to sort tasks based on the pay or date of expiration/submission or reputation of requester
    1 KB (185 words) - 19:45, 31 January 2016
  • * Moderator is chosen among the workers with either high reputation or expertise in the field or both by the requester. - If the submission is accepted the worker gains reputation else its unchanged.
    4 KB (617 words) - 23:21, 31 January 2016
  • ...their experience, and most critically, start evaluating key signals for a reputation engine. This warming period might involve doing a few different types of ta
    1 KB (213 words) - 19:24, 31 January 2016
  • Reputation in many real world contexts seems like a way of conferring the skills someb So, what if we made a system in which a worker and a requesters reputation reflected historic information about their known work in a relatively trans
    1 KB (241 words) - 19:20, 31 January 2016
  • Reputation : [[WinterMilestone_3_PierreF_ReputationIdea_BayesianMultiScoring]]
    437 B (41 words) - 20:04, 31 January 2016
  • Reputation : [[WinterMilestone_3_PierreF_ReputationIdea_BayesianMultiScoring]]
    473 B (41 words) - 19:57, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation-related Idea ===
    586 B (57 words) - 19:57, 31 January 2016
  • ==Brainstorm for Reputation== ===How to improve reputation system beyond Boomerang? ([[:Media:Daemo white paper (private).pdf|read thi
    5 KB (835 words) - 06:46, 1 February 2016
  • • how to improve reputation system beyond Boomerang<br /> • how would reputation work for newcomers - workers/requesters<br />
    3 KB (420 words) - 12:15, 31 January 2016
  • Boomerang reputation system solves the problem of 'inflated rankings' very well, but it may crea Along with the Boomerang reputation system; a 'recommender system' should be present which recommends tasks to
    678 B (103 words) - 14:17, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation-related Idea ===
    1 KB (127 words) - 18:38, 31 January 2016
  • == Darkhorse idea : Sample tasks to build reputation == ...heir base reputation on these set of tasks. This helps new workers build a reputation without having to wait too long.
    369 B (59 words) - 18:38, 31 January 2016
  • [[File:reputation.png]] Boomerang reputation system depends on feedback from requesters to allow them to connect to work
    2 KB (324 words) - 17:43, 31 January 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te ...of your trust-related ideas to http://crowdresearchw16-m3.meteor.com/?cat=reputation and a link to each of your power-related ideas to http://crowdresearchw16-
    3 KB (416 words) - 13:32, 31 January 2016
  • ...gory or "Guild" (coders, lawyers, etc..) can choose its variations for the reputation system like in sets (such as in Venn diagram sets where the bigger has some
    768 B (122 words) - 16:21, 31 January 2016
  • ...positions of moderators can be filled by requesters and workers with high reputation. The “decision making place” will work as a form of “direct democracy ...requesters that approve them to get out of the "Purgatory" or to get more reputation.
    6 KB (989 words) - 18:27, 31 January 2016
  • ...egory or "Guild" (coders, lawyers, etc..) can choose its variations to the reputation system like in sets (like in Venn diagram sets where the bigger has some pr ...m where you have both levels and perhaps classes. Workers' and requesters' reputation linked directly to each skill area rather than an aggregate for all the tas
    11 KB (1,904 words) - 18:28, 31 January 2016
  • Boomerang reputation system solves the problem of 'inflated rankings' very well, but it may crea Along with the Boomerang reputation system; a 'recommender system' should be present which recommends tasks to
    678 B (103 words) - 14:15, 31 January 2016
  • == The Reputation System ==
    852 B (133 words) - 18:35, 31 January 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te ...of your trust-related ideas to http://crowdresearchw16-m3.meteor.com/?cat=reputation and a link to each of your power-related ideas to http://crowdresearchw16-
    1 KB (141 words) - 13:47, 31 January 2016
  • .... My idea is to push such appeal as a task to workers&requesters with good reputation and within the same category(or cluster) as the rejected work. And as a cro ...y not be enough available workers&requesters of the same cluster with good reputation, it can take some time to gather enough judgements and make a final judgeme
    2 KB (310 words) - 21:21, 15 February 2016
  • ...]]. Post it on http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/category/wintermilestone-3-reputation-ideas when done
    242 B (33 words) - 18:25, 25 January 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te ...elated ideas to http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/category/wintermilestone-3-reputation-ideas and a link to each of your power-related ideas to http://crowdresearc
    3 KB (363 words) - 21:34, 30 January 2016
  • ...to link their LinkedIn Profile and MOOC certificates in order to increase reputation.
    141 B (20 words) - 19:05, 31 January 2016
  • ...all the workers are connected by a chat server,they can discuss about the reputation of requesters w.r.t boomerang system in which they can only have the static ...same worker is working with any other crowdsourcing platform,the worker's reputation can be shown there.Thus, Daemo can become a central evaluation system.
    1 KB (197 words) - 07:56, 31 January 2016
  • == Dark horse idea for the reputation ranking system ==
    260 B (47 words) - 08:48, 31 January 2016
  • ==Reputation idea==
    1 KB (245 words) - 07:19, 2 February 2016
  • === Dive Deeper into Specific Ideas: Reputation ===
    2 KB (263 words) - 21:10, 31 January 2016
  • ...rker and one requester would not change (therefore, negating the Boomerang reputation system's processes).
    3 KB (432 words) - 20:50, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation-related Idea === I have tried to holistically address the issue of reputation and representation through some ideas and concepts and I cannot separate it
    9 KB (1,341 words) - 02:57, 5 February 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te ...elated ideas to http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/category/wintermilestone-3-reputation-ideas and a link to each of your power-related ideas to http://crowdresearc
    3 KB (363 words) - 21:30, 25 January 2016
  • How would reputation work for new workers? # Raise the reputation of new workers if they performed well through tasks.<br/>
    985 B (144 words) - 13:31, 1 February 2016
  • ...people to recognize good work and good requests to be able to further help reputation system and promote fairness. ...how the request has been presented, helps with better understanding of the reputation of the requester and can help people who were mislead during submission of
    1 KB (212 words) - 19:26, 31 January 2016
  • ==Improving Reputation== Designing a system with a more fair reputation system and giving worker and requester equal power.
    2 KB (269 words) - 19:13, 31 January 2016
  • ...rs. These badges should not be used as filters but should improve worker's reputation within the system. Being an active user on Stackoverflow, I am greatly impr
    3 KB (391 words) - 10:46, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation-related Idea === '''SONAR: [SynchrOnous Network of Advance Reputation system.]'''
    4 KB (593 words) - 09:02, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation-related Idea === Implement an alternative to present reputation system. For example, reputation now shows percentage based on the last 100 or 1000 tasks done in the specif
    1 KB (189 words) - 23:13, 30 January 2016
  • 1. Boomerang reputation system to include special exceptions for new accounts under a certain numbe
    457 B (69 words) - 23:21, 30 January 2016
  • ...d pay higher wages to workers who fulfill specific criteria (fast workers, reputation (recommendation by other requester?), low rejection rate etc. (see 1.3 on g The above mentioned performance indicators are the basis for the reputation of a worker. The KPIs answer the question “How qualified is/was the worke
    7 KB (1,118 words) - 19:52, 31 January 2016
  • ...ne 3 seko-kamilamananova Further thoughts on: Dynamic pricing, Clustering, Reputation]]
    112 B (10 words) - 19:49, 31 January 2016
  • '''For each of the two ideas (one for reputation and one for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboard === Reputation-related idea ===
    1,010 B (132 words) - 08:57, 31 January 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te === Reputation-related Idea ===
    2 KB (324 words) - 01:47, 31 January 2016
  • ...game the system with valid proof then that worker will suffer a hit on his reputation and will be placed lower in the Boomerang ranking system
    2 KB (334 words) - 15:44, 31 January 2016
  • This page provides the details about the Reputation Idea I came up with for Winter Milestone 3 == How does it affect reputation ==
    2 KB (385 words) - 16:05, 31 January 2016
  • === Reputation-related Idea ===
    432 B (46 words) - 22:08, 30 January 2016
  • ...ve itself will pressure the workers to keep honest to maintain the group's reputation. Eventually more experienced workers might decide to abandon their collecti
    1 KB (250 words) - 22:05, 30 January 2016
  • ...ned. While a banned requester can simply create a new account, the loss of reputation should be punishment enough, since users will be unlikely to trust new requ
    1 KB (183 words) - 21:43, 30 January 2016
  • For each of the 2 ideas (1 for reputation, 1 for representation), describe (using diagrams, sketches, storyboards, te ...elated ideas to http://crowdresearch.meteor.com/category/wintermilestone-3-reputation-ideas and a link to each of your power-related ideas to http://crowdresearc
    2 KB (295 words) - 19:23, 31 January 2016
  • ...fact that workers still base a lot what HITs they take on the requester's reputation (found on forums like TurkerNation) and whether or not the worker has had g
    6 KB (1,111 words) - 17:34, 31 January 2016
  • ...title=WinterMilestone_3_yashovardhan_MiddleOut_Reputation_System MiddleOut Reputation System]
    3 KB (387 words) - 14:19, 31 January 2016
  • ==MiddleOut Reputation== MiddleOut tries to overcome these shortcomings by implementing a Reputation System where :
    4 KB (569 words) - 14:19, 31 January 2016
  • ...title=WinterMilestone_3_yashovardhan_MiddleOut_Reputation_System MiddleOut Reputation System]) for implementation. ...ng a user's rating continuously we can determine the subset of users whose reputation has been on the decline for a given period of time, and/or has shown no sig
    3 KB (532 words) - 14:18, 31 January 2016
  • My idea for Reputation (Winter Milestone 3) == How does it affect reputation ==
    1 KB (210 words) - 16:28, 1 February 2016
  • We should use daemo as our internal platform to test all reputation, representation and other systems. Imagine if Bernstein and Rajan and DRI w
    9 KB (1,468 words) - 18:26, 31 January 2016
  • ...g are worth their time. To solve this issue, Daemo introduces Boomerang, a reputation system that incentivizes alignment between opinion and ratings by increasin
    2 KB (353 words) - 19:22, 7 February 2016
  • ...tched with respected Requester , this is greatly accomplished by Boomerang reputation , boomerang will allow a better Worker-requester interaction , the negative ...tags is received and the list of workers with each having a set of skills,reputation score etc , we can use certain matching algorithms to find the best matchi
    6 KB (1,054 words) - 02:57, 8 February 2016
  • '''''IMPROVING REPUTATION SYSTEMS FOR CROWD-SOURCING PLATFORMS''''' ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform would focus on auto tagging or a
    7 KB (1,127 words) - 18:44, 7 February 2016
  • ...will find another worker to complete it and the worker suffers a negative reputation.
    4 KB (725 words) - 17:54, 7 February 2016
  • *The system use the good reputation and previous approval of the related requester parameters to issue a task f ...hey would have a higher chance of relying on them. If we could combine the reputation and the previous approval of a requester; we can combine these two tools to
    9 KB (1,549 words) - 20:07, 7 February 2016
  • ...ntral idea of the current marketplace perspective that workers with better reputation get to perform tasks with higher compensation. It must also be mentioned th
    8 KB (1,217 words) - 13:29, 7 February 2016
  • ...e feedback loop between them. In this proposal, we focus on optimizing the reputation system and feedback loop to improve the overall user experience on the mark ...reas of expertise. And each subcategory has its own metrics to compute the reputation score for that subcategory.
    8 KB (1,252 words) - 18:24, 9 February 2016
  • ...orkers trust requesters and existing qualification system makes workers’ reputation even more important. ...eputation system of the online shop of Alibaba and TurkOption, we set up a reputation system with text reviews.
    7 KB (1,211 words) - 06:34, 8 February 2016
  • ...ow rating reduces that likelihood. Boomerang, though solves the problem of reputation and combats the widespread rating inflation ,does not take into account the
    4 KB (680 words) - 13:22, 7 February 2016
  • * Is the rating system working to enhance the reputation of work?
    5 KB (827 words) - 06:21, 7 February 2016
  • ...elp people with their questions so on a crowdsourcing platform like Daemo, reputation can fundamentally change how the system works. Having requesters rate the w
    3 KB (519 words) - 20:08, 7 February 2016
  • '''''IMPROVING REPUTATION SYSTEMS FOR CROWD-SOURCING PLATFORMS''''' ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform would focus on auto tagging or a
    19 KB (3,157 words) - 07:40, 15 February 2016
  • ...he skills of a worker , the boomerang works best for providing trustworthy reputation scores which can also be extended for other attributes , boomerang can also A has M(good) reputation score in 2015 ,
    5 KB (890 words) - 22:21, 14 February 2016
  • * On hover over the particular work, the reputation and the date is seen<br>
    1 KB (192 words) - 08:45, 14 February 2016
  • ...l Turk, Clickworker, and Microworkers fail to address '''all aspects''' of reputation and ranking between workers and requesters. Workers cannot easily search fo ...ly, ''Boomerang'' solves '''one aspect''' of the problem by introducing "a reputation system that differs from traditional rate-and-leave systems by 'boomerangin
    10 KB (1,525 words) - 20:01, 14 February 2016
  • a. Reputation ...case) and the global social perspective (which in this case would be that reputation more directly impacts at more or less all levels of incentivisation).
    18 KB (3,125 words) - 18:47, 6 March 2016
  • ...leading them to complete quickly with low quality which would affect their reputation within the system. ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform is expected to yield better res
    11 KB (1,906 words) - 18:35, 13 March 2016
  • ...n their chat rooms and threads. Be thoughtful! Researchers have a bit of a reputation for just marching in and telling Turkers what they really need, which isn't
    17 KB (2,601 words) - 10:58, 7 February 2016
  • ...l number of Workers choose to cheat Requesters and the system, corrupt the reputation of the workforce. - Willing to leave MTurk for platforms with better design and reputation engines
    11 KB (1,739 words) - 18:44, 24 January 2016
  • ...n their chat rooms and threads. Be thoughtful! Researchers have a bit of a reputation for just marching in and telling Turkers what they really need, which isn't
    14 KB (2,208 words) - 10:24, 21 January 2016
  • These needs boil down to two main issues: 1) task ranking and reputation, and 2) worker and requester representation (open governance). '''Reputation''':
    12 KB (1,901 words) - 11:04, 7 February 2016
  • ...pose an idea to group Workers into clusters, formed on the basis of varied reputation and common skills / tasks. This cluster of Workers could then discuss probl
    4 KB (709 words) - 11:26, 8 February 2016
  • =Intended Outcomes of Reputation Systems= The challenges with a global reputation system is that requesters and workers are humans and therefore have multifa
    5 KB (877 words) - 15:37, 1 February 2016
  • ...n't get ideal requesters - can we rank the relevant tasks, on the basis of reputation, skills, and other necessary aspects? ...could workers form guilds for specific expertise areas, then run their own reputation and ranking operations? Like how doctors and lawyers administer their own t
    11 KB (1,725 words) - 11:47, 7 February 2016
  • ...ther-sensemaking for task partner selection in the forms of trust systems, reputation systems, qualification systems. ...e of understanding the user behind the role been focused on trust systems, reputation systems, and quality systems.
    15 KB (2,192 words) - 08:57, 8 February 2016
  • * reputation evolution according to worker attitude and requester attitude. ...mple, natural eviction of spammers and unfair requesters, promotion of the reputation of skilled workers, correct pricing range, etc...
    8 KB (1,309 words) - 20:18, 11 February 2016
  • ...rang system, in addition to experience, we would like to see the impact of reputation/ranking on the quality of task authorship.
    9 KB (1,414 words) - 10:56, 7 February 2016
  • ...n't get ideal requesters - can we rank the relevant tasks, on the basis of reputation, skills, and other necessary aspects? ...necessary for a healthy crowdsourcing marketplace — for example accurate reputation ratings, skill tags on tasks, and hourly wage estimates for tasks — that
    11 KB (1,859 words) - 07:15, 14 February 2016
  • The intuition behind Boomerang is that it's a reputation system that influences the quality of tasks/workers. The feedback the users
    7 KB (1,178 words) - 11:47, 15 February 2016
  • ...necessary for maintaining a healthy crowdsourcing platform, like accurate reputation ratings, skill tags on tasks, and hourly wage estimates for tasks, by makin ...leted as quickly as possible. So we need techniques for providing accurate reputation ratings, classification of tasks into various categories, and hourly wage e
    7 KB (1,055 words) - 14:10, 14 February 2016
  • According to the paper “Reputation Inflation: Evidence from an Online Labor Market by John J. Horton & Joseph ...rent quality of the workers. Workers who have already earned a stable good reputation score may be incentivized to slack off in the upcoming tasks, or workers’
    4 KB (636 words) - 17:45, 14 February 2016
  • ...necessary for a healthy crowdsourcing marketplace — for example accurate reputation ratings, skill tags on tasks, and hourly wage estimates for tasks — that ...reases interactions between workers and requesters that not only have good reputation but also keep posting tasks that are more aligned with workers' skills and
    10 KB (1,773 words) - 08:53, 14 February 2016
  • ...elp people with their questions so on a crowdsourcing platform like Daemo, reputation can fundamentally change how the system works. Having requesters rate the w
    9 KB (1,488 words) - 10:13, 15 February 2016
  • ...workers, or better requesters, by reporting honestly. The global win: the reputation scores more directly reflect individual incentives. This is Boomerang as pr ...they get access to their future tasks. (This is a smaller effect than the reputation feedback above, but does have an impact.) This prevents "accept all submiss
    10 KB (1,687 words) - 11:55, 21 February 2016
  • ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform is expected to yield better res ...w standard (the next de-facto platform), Daemo which includes Boomerang, a reputation system that introduces alignment between ratings and likelihood of collabor
    16 KB (2,716 words) - 12:36, 22 February 2016
  • 1) Tasks need to be tagged with particular skills , reputation scores and categories to uniquely identify the cluster of attributes requir
    5 KB (786 words) - 04:51, 22 February 2016
  • ...workers, or better requesters, by reporting honestly. The global win: the reputation scores more directly reflect individual incentives. This is Boomerang as pr ...they get access to their future tasks. (This is a smaller effect than the reputation feedback above, but does have an impact.) This prevents "accept all submiss
    7 KB (1,144 words) - 12:47, 25 February 2016
  • ...uilding a next generation crowd-sourcing platform, Daemo integrated with a reputation system, Boomerang. The improvised platform is expected to yield better res ...w standard (the next de-facto platform), Daemo which includes Boomerang, a reputation system that introduces alignment between ratings and likelihood of collabor
    11 KB (1,856 words) - 14:20, 28 February 2016
  • ...if the requester doesn’t like what I do? And how does all this solve the reputation problem? Try to pitch a story/wireframe with specific design that has as fe
    5 KB (857 words) - 22:08, 29 February 2016
  • ...too many eggs in one basket. Worker approval rating high. Using requester reputation as a proxy for trust. Does try new requesters. Uses communication to probe ...s and conversation with workers. Uses an UG. How are you managing your own reputation as a requester to ensure good work, with good people? In ideal work, there
    9 KB (1,397 words) - 01:16, 20 January 2016

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)