Difference between revisions of "Summer Milestone 6 Micro-macro Requester view of posting a task by ARichmondFuller"

From crowdresearch
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
Line 30: Line 30:
 
My paper prototype for requester UI of task creation page
 
My paper prototype for requester UI of task creation page
  
[[File:Task posting UI 1.jpg|950px]]
+
[[File:Task posting UI 1.jpg|750px]]
  
[[File:Task_posting_UI_2.jpg|950px]]
+
[[File:Task_posting_UI_2.jpg|750px]]

Latest revision as of 00:12, 1 July 2015

Excuse the lack of formatting and the ridiculously huge photos. I need to crowdsource my wiki submission work, eh.


Click the link to see the process I went though in creating a task in Freelancer. Screenshots included. File:Task creation process in Freelancer.pdf

Key Questions: How do we decide when to pause the task and to review the submissions to ensure the quality of the task design in the case of Micros tasks and for the workers to “apply” to do the task in the case of macros tasks? Should the “pause” be after a certain number of HITs (for micro-tasks), after a certain number of workers have indicated their interest in doing the work or after a certain timeframe?

Is that initial work (submission) considered Milestone0? Should we revisit the idea of having a "task application" where Milestone0 get set once the worker/workers are selected to complete the tasks?


Should there be payment for that initial submission? If so, what percentage of the total cost of task completion?

ARichmondFuller’s thoughts on this: Milestone0 should paid and set only after the initial round of HITs (micro) and worker applications (macro). The requester identifies the timeframe (deadline – selected using calendar pop up) or maximum number of “applications” and the percentage of the total budget to be paid based on personal needs. Historical data is to be generated and presented to the requester on this platform as a “suggestion” to help him/her make an informed choice.

Once the task is posted an "Open comments/discussion board" will appear below the posted task which can be used to clarify the task should there be and questions and concerns from the workers.

The requester chooses who he/she wants to complete Milestone0. If this doesn't end up being completed to the required quality, the requester will then have the option to begin the process of finding appropriate workers again.

Once the requester is satisfied with the initial "application" or "quality of HITs" then he/she can go ahead, select which worker/s he/she wants to complete the rest of the milestones and then set the rest of the task completion into motion.

Future development Workers will be “appraised” (levelled) to identify them as “newbie, experienced or advanced” and matched to the task requests depending on the needs of the requester.

My paper prototype for requester UI of task creation page

Task posting UI 1.jpg

Task posting UI 2.jpg